I can't with this. Ugh. Last time I checked straight men aren't buying Vogue so I really don't see the point in putting a glorified underwear model on the cover. She isn't high fashion, she never will be. Would it be too much to ask to put a model on who is high fashion and has worked her way to the top of the industry like Karlie as opposed to someone who is famous for shaking her big t*ts in online videos?
This cover is gorgeus! Easily their best of the year and the best work by Testino in a long time.
Does she deserve this cover? Perhaps not, not before Karlie and other actual hf models but I can make a pretty big list of undeserving celebrities that already covered Vogue US...
The only thing i like is the styling they covered stuff up which is good she needs to be. There are people more deserving, but give credit to Kate and her team for scoring her this. I want to see some of the other eds. Kate's isn't that good at all. Vogue/Kate how stupid do you think we are with training part? We all know she don't train. just stop lying. Posted via Mobile Device
I actually prefer this over her UK Vogue cover, and as for all the hate she's getting, all I need to say is that she's the one on the cover, not any of us, sooo....
"American Dream Girl" followed by "hottest supermodel on earth" Vogue really knows how to shove it in your face. And to that Kate Upton stan who said that ~women are especially grinding over this, you're dead wrong.
The shadow on her face is throwing me off, she has such a round face and it shows on the left side but because of the sharp shadow on the right it cuts it off a bit and makes her look asymmetrical throwing it off a bit. Her eyes aren't giving as much conviction and connection to the lens as they could.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.