fashionista-ta
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2005
- Messages
- 17,327
- Reaction score
- 838
Designers these days lack any individuality let alone personality and may as well be assembly-line robots that churn out mid-range department-store offerings: Virginie and Maria Grazia exemplify this new conservatism in the industry so frighteningly on point. (And just throw down some shallow “feminist” slogan so no one dares accuse you of mediocrity.)
I was curious on what Karl said that was perceived as “Islamophobia”, and what he said was :“You cannot kill millions of Jews and then take in millions of their worst enemies afterwards, even if there are decades [between the two events].” Chanel’s Karl Lagerfeld claims Muslim migrants are ‘affront to Holocaust victims’ | World | The Times Admittedly a rather insensitive generalization that’s more classist than racist/xenophobic. He’s not wrong in that he was likely referencing the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. But of course people immediately ignore the reference and context and race to accuse him as anti-Muslim :sigh:
(Back in 1993, Karl designed a Chanel HC collection in tribute to his Muslim clientele. But they protested for his use of scriptures from the Quran as fashion accents and all pieces were immediately burned out of respect. He may be insensitive to the changing times, but to still brand him as “islamophobic” is so delberately ridiculous.)
I find it quite ironic that a German referenced the Holocaust and implied that Muslims were the enemy in question. He is 100% wrong, there is nothing right about what he said. The Holocaust was wrong, and refusing asylum to Muslims is also wrong. Karl didn't seem to understand that the common ground between Germans, Jews, and Muslims is that all are human beings. And we should have no sworn enemies based on religion or ethnicity, something plenty of Jews, Muslims, and no doubt Germans know.