Balmain for H&M | Page 11 | the Fashion Spot

Balmain for H&M

lebaronlouis, remember to list a credit for every image you post here. or your posts will be deleted.

via _FabricioGS on twitter.

i wish they weren't making what appears to be gang signs in this promotional image. it looks unseemly. :blink:

It's a West Coast sign and the peace sign. Nothing looks similar to a gang sign, at all.
 
There is a feature about Balmain in this week's the new yorker. the writer followed olivier over many months.

he says that fashion criticism (ie in the new york times and other respected publications doesnt matter anymore

it's all about the instagram likes apparently.:rolleyes:

you can read the whole story here

here's a passage in regards to the H&M collaboration:

Since Rousteing took over, Balmain has expanded from an exclusive Paris house into one with global ambitions, with a new shop in London, a sprawling store opening this winter in New York, and plans for outlets in Los Angeles, Doha, Dubai, and Macau. This fall, Rousteing presents a collection with the “fast fashion” label H & M, which has previously collaborated with Karl Lagerfeld, Stella McCartney, and Alexander Wang. The partnership will provide Balmain with a barrage of promotion, including TV commercials, digital billboards, and magazine advertising. H & M has been controversial in recent years, as critics accuse it of producing clothes in Third World “sweatshops,” and the new collection is built around cut-rate versions of Rousteing’s garments. But Balmain expects that the collaboration will only improve its image. “It will make the Balmain customer see how everyone wants Balmain but can’t have it,” the label’s C.E.O., Emmanuel Diemoz, says. “Also, so many people now are making money so fast, maybe the H & M customer will soon become the Balmain customer.”


This June, Rousteing was in London to shoot a television commercial for the H & M-Balmain rollout. Not long before, Vanessa Friedman had written an article noting that the two companies had called their collaboration a “movement of togetherness,” which she described as “almost terrifyingly cynical.” Rousteing was still agitated. During a break in the shoot, he hurried across the cavernous studio, where a crew of hundreds—photographers, makeup artists, seamstresses, set builders—were at work. Rousteing dropped into a chair beside Txampi Diz, Balmain’s public-relations director, and complained bitterly about Friedman.

Turning to me, Diz said, “That’s off the record.”

“Non,” Rousteing said. “If she hits at me, I can say, ‘I don’t like it.’ ” But then he grew philosophical: perhaps his Instagram followers wouldn’t care. “I can speak straight to my Balmain army, instantly, and I am making fashion for them,” he told Diz. “It is too bad for critics if they cannot understand this, but the truth is now that their critiques do not matter.”

When Diz disputed this, Rousteing interrupted: “Who would you rather have in the front row? A celebrity or a critic?”

“There is room for both,” Diz said judiciously.

“No,” Rousteing said. “Only one. Celebrity or critic?”

“Room for both,” Diz repeated.

Rousteing, laughing, persisted until Diz gave up, craning his neck to gaze silently at the ceiling.

“You see?” Rousteing said.
 
What an odd ethos behind a collection? Let's do a cheaper range to highlight all the people who want the main line but can't afford it?
 
Will this collection have a runway show like previous H&M collaborations?
 
Olivier sounds like such and articulate, mature and educated person. A walking stereotype of a fashion airhead.
 
^^^ He is very much a living caricature of the fashion designer that many, many people are attracted to, down to his pigeon-toe pose. Same with his brand of designs. It’s all very easily digestible and consumed; It’s fashion 101. And the InstaCelebrities he’s associated with just adds to his and Balmain’s fluffy superficial, jet set partygirl reputation. Him, his InstaBesties and his fashions are Bratz and Monster High dolls come-to-life— or vise-versa, same thing. Both are as plastic and tacky as they come.

There is a feature about Balmain in this week's the new yorker. the writer followed olivier over many months.

he says that fashion criticism (ie in the new york times and other respected publications doesnt matter anymore

it's all about the instagram likes apparently.:rolleyes:

you can read the whole story here

here's a passage in regards to the H&M collaboration:

I actually believe that statement is very much a truth, unfortunately.

Balmain has become critic-proof for now— much like those awful, mindless blockbusters Star Wars Prequels, Marvel Legends and Transformers movies. As long they they keep churning out the loud, tacky colorful OTT action pieces, and flood the market with toys, these films will continue to break bank. Same idea with Balmain— just replace the toys with his “army”.

Sheesh, unless you’re a 14-year-old girl, why would you not be embarrassed by that "army" tag? But I’m sure Olivier wouldn’t care for what a 35-year-old geezer like me who wouldn’t touch his fashions with a 10-mile pole thinks.
 
if he's angry about Vanessa Friedman's criticism in the NY Times about the H&M announcement can you imagine how angry he's going to be about this New Yorker piece?:blink:Especially the bit about his habit of pouting and sucking in his cheeks whenever a camera is pointed at him?:lol:

of course, he'll probably turn around and parrot the idea that Balmain is for "the people" - not the critics. never mind that most people can't afford Balmain mainline or won't even be able to purchase the H&M items because they will sell out so fast. I wonder how he'll face the criticism when balmain's fans can't buy it?

I've noticed that some of the Balmain for H&M logoed items say "Balmain New York" on them instead of "Balmain Paris". I wonder if this is meant to help promote the Balmain store that is opening in NY this fall.
 
^^^ Whenever one gets to a certain point in their career as Olivier has, I can understand the lack of perspective, and self-awareness that he, and even his handlers have. So the idea of their very young, impressionable Insta-“army” will soon be making big money and spending it on mainline Balmain is either a marketing mantra to hype their brand, or they’re so out of touch that they’re not even aware of a recession. Ivory Tower and all that.

If there’s one brand that can secure the success of a diffusion line in this financial climate, I would think it’s Balmain. This H&M collaboration will do well: In a sense, Balmain is very much what the general public is attracted to as “high fashion”. There must be something quite big to stop them from releasing a cheaper line. Because SM follower-count can’t sustain a label alone, and there are only so many partygirls and wannabes that are willing to pay retail. Maybe they’re testing with the H&M output… They have to know that their followers aren’t going to be loyal and invested in this brand for long so better strike soon before the peasants revolt when they can't even get the H&M-version.
 
^I saw! Thanks!

I just want two pieces. The cream double breasted blazer and the black and white striped blouse. :)
 
I'm glad to see some toned down pieces that can be worn any day, like that bronzey sweater, the black and white turtleneck, and the red and black dress.
 
I really think this is an appalling collaboration and incredibly lazy.

The pieces featured have been copied directly from previous collections that the house has sold for thousands and are now selling them for not even 10% of their original price.

No alterations have been made, even the mens leather jackets, one of those retails for £2,900. I believe the white blazer with black collar detail (originally from Spring 2012) retailed for around £1,600 - neither have been altered aside from their fabric quality. Olivier has just picked through the archive instead of doing what a bulk of designers have done and actually established a collection with their aesthetics and sold with some credibility. This just makes an idiot out of their customer who is forking money hand over fist to potentially have a high end exclusive to find some cheap imitation under the same name for a high street collaboration.

I've lost all respect for the house.
 
^ but those customers paying that amount of money know it's the real deal so if they're bothered that people won't be able to tell the difference or that someone can get the same design (even if the quality is cheaper) for a lot less then I'm glad... that pretentious side of fashion bothers me to no end.
 
Seriously. It's not that deep. High fashion doesn't always need to be looked at as some sort of exclusive privilege. Live and let live. Who cares.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top