Absolutely reckless. This person is so unprincipled, so unprofessional, so morally offensive. How are they still employed by Harpers Bazaar / Vogue France?
I imagine this person is a freelancer - they'd have to be right?

Absolutely reckless. This person is so unprincipled, so unprofessional, so morally offensive. How are they still employed by Harpers Bazaar / Vogue France?

This Louis character is so symptomatic of the current social climate. He is drunk on the power afforded him by being a carefully crafted cocktail of intersectionality. We have received nonstop messaging for the last several years that someone who looks like him is incapable of doing wrong, that pearls of wisdom pour out of his mouth by the mere nature of his being, that anything he does carries weight and gravitas, that he is an unsung arbiter of all trends...I could go on. But this kind of messaging gets into people's heads. It fills his with delusions of grandeur and a dangerous sense of infallibility. It fills our head's with fear to ever question, dislike or call out his behavior...because we all know what we'll be called if we have no taste for his actions or words. We saw the same kind of nonsense coming from Billy Porter just a month or two ago...who had the audacity to believe he deserved a Vogue cover because we wears quinceanera dresses on the red carpet? And had an actual nerve to say that he is responsible for gender bending style full stop???
This has got to end.

With regards to the recent 'N-word' allegation, this is precisely why these types of unsubstantiated claims/gossip/allegations are so dangerous, because they sound like they could be true despite no credible evidence being presented . Do I believe that Lee was difficult to work with? Absolutely, but that's all I know at this point and until a credible journalist corroborates these very specific and serious allegations, I will have to leave it at that. I could say that I heard from a reliable source that Lee was physically and sexually abusive in the workplace (I didn't btw)...but hey, given that we already know he was difficult to work with, it sounds like it could be true, right? Let's now have a prolonged discussion about (the very real) issues of physical and sexual abuse in fashion.Regardless of whether or not these Pisano claims are true, we’ve already gotten word that Lee wasn’t the easiest man to work with on Earth previously. As successful as his Bottega was, the TWO Salon fiascos back-to-back, including claims of unprofessionalism, lack of regard for health/safety...
See, this is more conjecture based on an (as of now) baseless allegation. The team and board are mostly White, so an employee saying the N-word during a meeting definitely sounds like it could be true. Sorry @Armani , I don't mean for this to sound like an attack on your entire point, which is nuanced and well thought out, it's just that a lot of misinformation/falsehoods spread like wildfire online today because they retain a kernel of truth (in this case that Lee was difficult to work with) despite a lack of evidence for the central allegation (that Lee used the N-word in a meeting). I'm not even a fan of Lee's Bottega or Kering for that matter, but whether or not this specific allegation is true, we will have to wait and see. For now, I am certain that Lee was a nightmare to work with and until we hear anything credible and specific, I will have to leave it at that.Yet it’s true the majority of the Bottega team under Lee are also White, and there’s a sense of security & comfortability emerging from that alone to say things you wouldn’t particularly say in front of a POC - Black person in particular, given the context here.
Completely agree.That’s not to excuse Pisano either, however. Between the JWAndersonKetamine situation & the publication of these Lee claims in such a public & tea-spilling manner (under the display name Bottega’s Vendetta, aptly enough), NO ONE with such an affiliation in fashion as that with Vogue France, even (if not especially, LOL…) with their previous scathing tweets against Alt & her lack of diversity taken into account, should be speaking on social media in the same vein as any other stan… there comes a point, when one has accumulated a large platform & a high position in society, where such carefree condemnation of those also in respectable positions can quite easily lead to legal action, along with possible/probable firing/“cancellation”/loss of peer support/loss of sponsorships on their OWN end, as a result. No one’s going to want to associate with Pisano soon if they only continue from this point on. There’s a reason why the bulk of influencers grow to become much more *wholesome* in their image when they attempt to make the transition over to pop culture. The difference between Pisano &, let’s say, a WWD or BoF writer, is that Pisano is merely a gossipy individual on their Twitter, whereas the writer operates to share fashion news under the company they work for. So I say this out of good faith - Pisano needs to STOP with the namedropping before it gets them & their peers/workplace in serious trouble.
You’re all good! I’m not taking it this way at all - I myself obviously don’t hang around in these circles, and have absolutely no clue whether these claims are in any way true or not. There’s additional context that can be used to guide people one way or the other - I definitely don’t consider Pisano the most reliable source by ANY means, and haven’t seen much to vet these claims (apart from those similar, if not lower, in source validity as them on Twitter - god forbid… so there truly is no direction I find myself leaning as of yet). I don’t want to remove the possibility of Lee having used the term in a meeting (nor the nudge Pisano’s made since then towards possible Detroit assault allegations), but equally as much have no reason to believe them as fully credible. Reputations are already getting tarnished as a result, but it’s still a waiting game for me just as much as it is for you as to whether… anything actually comes of it. I’m still firm that there’s too much piled on Lee at this point for him to be entirely innocent & for the firing to be unjustified. These Pisano claims are separate from simply *justifying a boot from Bottega*, and extremely, extremely serious. Therefore, if found untrue, it instead tarnishes the reputation of Pisano (which is exactly why these types of things probably shouldn’t be spewed on Twitter in such a nonchalant way, esp. when given by a third party, knowing the repercussions that can come of it for them, too… but I digress LOL)See, this is more conjecture based on an (as of now) baseless allegation. The team and board are mostly White, so an employee saying the N-word during a meeting definitely sounds like it could be true. Sorry @Armani , I don't mean for this to sound like an attack on your entire point, which is nuanced and well thought out, it's just that a lot of misinformation/falsehoods spread like wildfire online today because it retains a kernel of truth (in this case that Lee was difficult to work with) despite a lack of evidence for the central allegation (that Lee used the N-word in a meeting).
She really believed that she invented something?
A couple of interesting things in this video:
1- How touching was Virgil going to talk and cheer up the designer who didn't win. What a lovely guy.
2- How desperate Marc was acting around Arnault... kinda sad to watch.
Not to defend Chanel, cause €700 for this calendar is a scam. But Chanel already post the picture and the inside contents in the description, so why getting mad at the brand. Maybe next time read the description before buying something.
Chanel also deleted the TikTok account.
Girl really bought a box of crap so she could go on TikTok and roast Chanel for a minute of fame. Guess that's what the world is all about nowadays lol
I agree that the price is ridiculous, as are the products inside the calendar but like THD96 said it's literally all in the description and she knew exactly what she was buying. But hey, she ''racked up over 41 million views on TikTok'' so I guess she earned back her money's worth. Ridiculous people.
Yes, Virgil was a class act. But it seems like people kinda discovered his personality after his work.
The critics against him were always about his work and what it represented but not against him as an individual.
I think it was more the fact that Chanel charged what they did for that crap and got exposed. Good on her for doing that, IMO. Shame on Chanel for such an insidious money grab.
Quite frankly, why wouldn't they when they're aware there are people like her who will pay for it just because they can anyway? It's not like Chanel prices were affordable and reasonable to begin with.