simple_elegance
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 4,328
- Reaction score
- 6
i like most of the short dresses, but that's about it.
I'm already tired of all the immature comments about Lindsay, comments that really have nothing to do with this presentation/show.
^ Your wishes are fulfilled...
This just popped up on my news alerts from WWD:
WWD Fashion Flash: Lindsay's Debut Fizzles at Ungaro
I don't think she designs any since she's a creative director or something where she just pick the ones that are great, etc.i really dont believe that lohan is "designing" anything, or even having a major say in fact. this is purely for publicity and they are just exploiting her name (or what's left of it).
^ Doesn't the link work? I can post it if you like...
You know what? I like this better than just about anything Cortazar has done.
I think the whole article is available only for paying customers.


there are thousands of budding designers/fashion students out there who can do better than this, thousands.
), and their jobs are being (supposedly) done by morons who think whipping out an AMEX card qualifies someone to make design decisions...


Lindsay, it’s time to get serious about reviving the acting career. After just one season, one show, Mounir Moufarrige’s Lindsay-plus-one experiment is off to a troubled start. Lindsay Lohan, the house’s “creative director,” and designer Estrella Archs, (who probably got the job in part for her willingness to sketch in Lohan’s shadow, and probably took it for its high-profile heritage), made their joint debut on Sunday in an effort that was, quite simply, an embarrassment.
To be fair, there was something of a “Mean Girls” motif at play. The fashion world, or at least its old-fashioned, traditional arm, greeted the Lohan appointment with endless snickers and rolled eyes. Its members expected, perhaps even hoped for, the proverbial train wreck. And so it came, a collision of fashion, controversial celebrity and massive publicity that resulted in the most frenzied door scene we’ve seen in years, especially at the geezer venue Carrousel du Louvre, as well as a beefed-up photographers’ pit.
As for the clothes, they looked cheesy and dated, as has often been the case chez Ungaro during the post-Emanuel revolving door of designers. Hot pink, orange and flashy, with an overworked heart motif relentless in its execution, the collection displayed none of the promised younger side Lohan was supposed to deliver. Nor in a million years would one guess that the lineup was designed by one young woman and “creative directed” by another. Glitter heart pasties all around, ladies?
As for Lohan, she’ll weather the criticism, hardly her first or her juiciest, and move on when her contract allows. But Archs has her work cut out for her. Backstage after the show, she said the collection “had to be designed very quickly.” Perhaps that was the problem. This storied house has been in disarray for years, and though Archs’ debut provided no indication that she’s up to the challenge, she should be given the chance to find out without a younger, nonskilled judge with theoretical veto power hovering about. (Let’s just say the ladies’ joint bow didn’t radiate chemistry.)
No one ever said fashion design is brain surgery. It’s a different discipline altogether. But it is indeed a discipline and a commercial art, a fact variously muted and underscored by the celebrity infiltration of the last decade. And like brain surgery — yes, like brain surgery and all disciplines at which people work for years to develop proficiency — it has its rare geniuses and capable practitioners, all of whom must possess talent, skill and dedication. Being a young, pretty, controversial woman who looks good in clothes and photo ops just isn’t enough.