Agreed. I can't even believe it was nominated tbqh
I agree that, if best picture was really about awarding the best movie,
Avatar should not have been nominated.
In a perfect word, a Best Picture (BP) candidate should have one standout performance in both acting categories (main and supporting), a flawless screenplay and great direction.
Avatar had only one of these (i.e. direction; Zoe's performance was great but doesn't qualify) and thus should not have been considered.
However, as I said in the Golden Globes fashion thread, BP is a populist award.
It consistently awards movies that have met with both critical and commercial success (with few exceptions) and are the flavor of the year, so to speak. People getting on their high horse saying the GG have lost credibility are ridiculous, as credibility was lost a long time ago.
Look at the BP winner list, it's pretty much a joke. Last year was
Slumdog Millionaire (
!!!!), which was running against movies such as
Frost/Nixon and
The Reader. Please, where is the credibility there?
It's time people stopped taking this award so seriously.
Lets hope the Academy have more sense.
It will be the same thing at the Oscars, for the same reason, baring a major backlash (and judging by the grim faces in the GG audience when Cameron won, it could happen).
That said, the Best director award (which is to be taken a bit more seriously), was
absolutely deserved by Cameron, imo.
I feel people who belittle his achievement and dismiss
Avatar as CGI do it out of ignorance.
The work he has accomplished with
Avatar is monumental. Cameron didn't just throw a script to CGI artists and then went on a Holyday: he was involved in absolutely every aspect of the movie including the new technology that was developed with his intimate co-operation and to suit his vision. In the end, he simply delivered a
new way to do movies.
C'mon, the man has worked for over a decade to deliver a product that brought people back to the movie theatres in a way that hasn't been seen since... wait for it...
Titanic.
How could anyone think Cameron's exceptional work is not worth the highest distinction is beyond my comprehension.
Inglorious Basterds was the better movie (although
Avatar was the better overall experience and entertainment), but Quentin didn't do anything groundbreaking, I'm sorry. It was work as usual for him, not his crowning achievement.
IB will age better but
Avatar will have the most lasting impact to the movie-making industry and will come to be acknowledged as a turning point (for bad or good? The jury is still out).
It's well worth a Best Director award, imo.
Rant over. I need to learn to be concise.