the cut of this collection is odd; the cut is extremely feminine. the bust of the jackets and the shape through the hip is made to accomodate hips and breasts. the shape of the shoulders is also not particularly masculine. now there's such a thing as innovation and change of shape, but this is the feminization of men. it's aggrovated by the appearance of the models who lack that muscular development of a man (but some idiot is going too say something about blah blah models have to be thin to wear the clothes - no they don't). it's an odd collection for a house which isn't known to be on a good financial footing, and which has a revolving image in fashion. raf should create a stronger identity, and diverge from it less wildly. the more extreme designs would be better at a later date, after the house is re-established to a greater degree.
I couldnt disagree with you more, it seems you contradict yourself by talking about the cut and then say he needs to create a stronger indentity. As far as i know Jill is one of the collections everyone is looking at nowadays. I feel he is being provocative in a very classic way