hum...i dont see print as an easier way out. i think it's one of the hardest techniques to be incorporated onto a garment. print can easily break or make an outfit, like on the verge of gaudy/tacky. hard to make it look just right. especially for a brand like jil sander which focuses on minimalism, print is not easy to master.I'm trying to think why I don't dig this as much as I usually do, and then it strikes me that I liked it best when Raf Simons did a lot more fabric, texture, cut and colour experimentation with Jil Sander before. Prints are an "easier" way out somehow, but it is more surface and visual, so wished he had gone "deeper".
i thought raf simons (and his team) did a pretty good job on having the print work just right with the garment. at least i can look at it without getting a headache.
i tend to like it more when the designer experiment with fabric and cut too. personally i find print and textile hardddd

To me, print is like wallpaper or carpet, you can put in a really cool attractive design in an interior space drawn up on the Mac in a jiffy. Cut, fabric, etc. is more like shifting the walls, windows, floors and constructing them with the right materials, mesh, concrete, stone, rusted steel, etc. to create a spatial or light experience that you want to achieve, plus it's not just a static experience, but perhaps how you perceive it through movement in that space. The latter is undoubtedly a lot more spectacular and memorable. If print plays an additional role in achieving that complexity, as CdG does so admirably sometimes, then it's even better!