lili la tigresse
Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2008
- Messages
- 241
- Reaction score
- 0
I think the difference between the Brangelina thing and this is that there were no kids involved (Aniston had no kids). Second of all, there's this huge age difference which makes it a scandal... People always love to gossip about "Lolitas" with elder men...
And third of all, I don't think people were too surprised that Angelina "stole" Brad - as she was known as a seductress/vampy-ish woman, whereas Kristen - although not the smiley Hollywood type - did not come off as very cunning or the sex vamp... I think these factors make this story even more "scandalous" and surprising.
Not only this but that Rupert guy is no Brad Pitt. Angelina and Brad were a couple a lot of people wanted to see together. They were perfect, so sexy together. For a lot of people it was a match made in heaven, a little like the Craig/Weisz pairing.
And the Kristen and Rupert liaison won't end up with a ton of super cute kids.
That's why I disagree with the people who say that this scandal won't hurt her career.