Model Behavior (PLEASE READ POST #1 BEFORE POSTING)

[tapenerd]

Oh yeah that totally sounds like a Terry shoot.

 

[ghostwriter10549]

And what about Gisele?? She is making waves in the media with her recent comments and revelations like the fact that she cried when their made her to do a topless against her will in her first show (McQueen) and the details of how she felt in the beginning of her relationship with Tom (his ex-girlfriend was pregnant when they were in their 2nd mouth), quite interesting.

 

[WeberFanatic]

My guess is she walked of the set of a Terry Richardson shoot for Vogue Paris.

I don’t think this a Terry shoot Mikel because she said she never worked for them again and Terry had been photographing Erin since 2001. Doing a Vogue Paris editorial with him in 2001 and 2008 and numerous ad campaigns for H&M, Pinko, etc. The last time he photographed her was 2012 for Terrywood’s premiere. I think it’s someone different.

 

[Benn98]

Yikes! LMAO.

Let Emily Ratajkowski Explain Single-Payer Health Care to You

OCTOBER 9, 2018 3:00 PM

It’s much easier to understand something complicated if you’re really paying attention—which is why is why we wanted to cut through the noise of cable news and Twitter trolls to explain some of the more complex political issues ahead of the November 2018 midterm elections, in slightly more appealing packaging than you may be used to.

Enter Emily Ratajkowski, model, actress, and political activist fresh off an arrest at the U.S. Capitol for protesting the Supreme Court nomination of Brett Kavanaugh; Ratajkowski has been an outspoken supporter of progressive causes, and signed on to help us explain one very important concept that voters need to know about when they head to the polls. Single-payer health care: You’ve probably heard about it, but how different is it from our current health-care system? How do we pay for it? What about Medicare for All? We have a feeling that you might remember the answers to these questions a little better when choosing a candidate, and in the voting booth, after having seen this video.

Our theory is: You can’t vote for your candidates if you don’t understand the positions they’re running on. So now you know! See you on November 6.

Source: Vogue.com

 

[Les_Sucettes]

Yikes! LMAO.




Source: Vogue.com

Is this the equivalent of the Sun's page three girls?!
I wonder if anyone told her, that although tongue and cheek (actually like Sun's topless ladies) at the end of the day is incredibly sexist and demeaning.

 

[Benn98]

Is this the equivalent of the Sun's page three girls?!
I wonder if anyone told her, that although tongue and cheek (actually like Sun's topless ladies) at the end of the day is incredibly sexist and demeaning.

Lmao! I'm more surprised that politics had to be dumbed down like this in order for it to be palatable to Vogue'snew readership. It's embarrassing.

 

[Runabout]

Lmao! I'm more surprised that politics had to be dumbed down like this in order for it to be palatable to Vogue'snew readership. It's embarrassing.

To quote a Japanese TV show I watch, "That's not quite right"

But given Vogue's out-of-touch antics, I'm not even surprised they had to pull that one out. They could do better.

 

[magsaddict]

I'm all for Vogue using their platform to boost political engagement and dialogue, but the method could do with some streamlining.

 

[JPineapple]

Does anybody know what happened?

 

[Armani]

Does anybody know what happened?

A paparazzi is suing her for posting a candid of herself on her profile. Instagram has been very restrictive on candid photos recently, taking down huge fanpages and deleting viral videos because they’re owned by another source. Khloe Kardashian was recently sued for posting a pap pic of herself as well...

Comments:

@angelcandices: Couldn’t have written it better!

@gisele: That’s right !

@cocorocha: Love you @gigihadid. In my opinion, anytime someone takes your photo - without your written consent or any binding legal agreement - the default should be that you and the photographer have now “collaborated” and you have as much right to own and use that image and dictate its use as the person taking it (if not more). Your image is your brand, it’s the entire DNA of your business. You spent years developing this image, they spent 2 seconds clicking a button. The current status quo makes no sense.
Reply by @gigihadid: couldn’t agree more Coco! I will fight to change this. Both parties should have rights. Period. ps love u too

@bellahadid: Well said sister ! Thank you

@emrata: Yesss thank you
Reply by @shaninamshaik: it’s outrageous they make cash of our pics and they must get paid again.

@sarasampaio: Yessss! So true!!!! Can’t understand how it’s legal for them to take a photo you without consent, but then you can’t use that same pic without their consent! Crazyyyy

@lamekafox: I respect you so much for posting this. Safety is the top priority and you should be able to live your life without the stress and worry of being followed for a picture let alone legally perused because of this. There need to be stricter laws regarding the safety of those in the public eye being followed by photographers. I don’t experience this in the same degree as many of my peers but there are times leaving events/shows where the energy behind multiple photographers outside with flash in your face. I have someone who has harassed me daily on social media and through my private means of communication and I have no idea who this person is or what they look like. They can easily be the person behind the camera following me to my car or to an event and it gives me so much anxiety. No one deserves to have their privacy violated like that.

@kortajarenajon: So true

@stefaniegiesinger: Amen

@mayastepper: Yessss! Speak up!

@meghanroche: You are a QUEEN

@winnieharlow: Well said baby girl! Amen

@mckennahellam: Well said sending you love always x

 

[Benn98]

Not holding back. Heidi Klum came clean about her departure from Project Runway after she announced that she would not return to host season 17 of the reality competition series.
“I don’t feel like they need advice,” Klum told reporters at the amfAR Gala in Beverly Hills on Thursday, October 18, when asked if she offered guidance to her replacement, Karlie Kloss. “I feel like I left Project Runway in great hands with Karlie and with Christian Siriano, and I think they’re going to do a great job and I can’t wait to see how they’re going to change it because it needed some changes.”
The 45-year-old supermodel elaborated: “You know, it’s been stale for 16 years. It was great. But it needed something new to it. I feel like with new people and the way they do it [it] will have that. So I’m excited for that.”

I actually cannot stand Heidi Klum because like Karl said, 'she was never in Paris', lol, BUT, she's one classy lady! So many models can take a leaf out of her book on how to respond with grace. Plus she's brutally honest about it as well.

 

[Morgane07]

A paparazzi is suing her for posting a candid of herself on her profile. Instagram has been very restrictive on candid photos recently, taking down huge fanpages and deleting viral videos because they’re owned by another source. Khloe Kardashian was recently sued for posting a pap pic of herself as well...

Comments:

@angelcandices: Couldn’t have written it better!

@gisele: That’s right !

@cocorocha: Love you @gigihadid. In my opinion, anytime someone takes your photo - without your written consent or any binding legal agreement - the default should be that you and the photographer have now “collaborated” and you have as much right to own and use that image and dictate its use as the person taking it (if not more). Your image is your brand, it’s the entire DNA of your business. You spent years developing this image, they spent 2 seconds clicking a button. The current status quo makes no sense.
Reply by @gigihadid: couldn’t agree more Coco! I will fight to change this. Both parties should have rights. Period. ps love u too

@bellahadid: Well said sister ! Thank you

@emrata: Yesss thank you
Reply by @shaninamshaik: it’s outrageous they make cash of our pics and they must get paid again.

@sarasampaio: Yessss! So true!!!! Can’t understand how it’s legal for them to take a photo you without consent, but then you can’t use that same pic without their consent! Crazyyyy

@lamekafox: I respect you so much for posting this. Safety is the top priority and you should be able to live your life without the stress and worry of being followed for a picture let alone legally perused because of this. There need to be stricter laws regarding the safety of those in the public eye being followed by photographers. I don’t experience this in the same degree as many of my peers but there are times leaving events/shows where the energy behind multiple photographers outside with flash in your face. I have someone who has harassed me daily on social media and through my private means of communication and I have no idea who this person is or what they look like. They can easily be the person behind the camera following me to my car or to an event and it gives me so much anxiety. No one deserves to have their privacy violated like that.

@kortajarenajon: So true

@stefaniegiesinger: Amen

@mayastepper: Yessss! Speak up!

@meghanroche: You are a QUEEN

@winnieharlow: Well said baby girl! Amen

@mckennahellam: Well said sending you love always x

It would actually be funny if paparazzi decided to stop papping Gigi Hadid; I bet you she wouldn't be happy about that because she greatly benefits from it. I am surprised at her reaction. She has always greatly courted paparazzi since the very start. I don't even remember a celeb courting paps as much as she has if we exclude the Kardashians. Her mum, brother or friends always walk a few meters behind her when she gets out of her flat, so paps can get a clear shot, and articles can give the links to all the stuff she's wearing, so I just don't understand what she's talking about when she's referring to anxiety and emotional distress.
Paps and some celebs, particularly the Hadids or Kardashians, enjoy a mutually beneficial relationship, but paparazzi do not work for them; their work/picture remain their property.

 

[Scotty]

Kendall dragged for appropriation, again.

Vogue is responding to backlash and accusations of cultural appropriation after publishing photos of Kendall Jenner in an afro hairstyle.

While Instagram users have both praised and criticized Vogue and Jenner, the magazine has spoken out to clarify the inspiration behind the photos. In a statement obtained by E! News, Vogue said, "The image is meant to be an update of the romantic Edwardian/Gibson Girl hair which suits the period feel of the Brock Collection, and also the big hair of the '60s and the early '70s, that puffed-out, teased-out look of those eras. We apologize if it came across differently than intended, and we certainly did not mean to offend anyone by it."

Some Instagram users expressed disappointment in the magazine's choice in the comments of the image, while others came to its defense.

"They stay tryna turn white women into black women," one user wrote. "They rather pretend we don’t exist then give us credit. Ugh"

Another user said, "We used to have our hair burned and chemicals because society taught us that we were not beautiful with our afros now they copy our Afros but can’t use actual BLACK models with Afros!"

"She looks dumb. Leave afros for the beautiful black women," another directed.

Others were less-convinced the hairstyle was an attempt at an afro.

"I see a teased hair waiting for a beehive! Thatz all!" a user wrote. "All the anger about this is nonsense. Even if the intent was to be an afro its hella not! Look at our black kings and queens and google what an afro looks like! Angry for nothing."

"I'm all for my people but Y'all are really reaching," a person wrote, "her hair is curled and teased this does not look like an afro"

 

[anlabe32]

I'm sorry but they're reaching here. And I hate Kendall and her family but this wasn't her idea, she's just doing her job.

 

[Morgane07]

I don't know but I have the impression that Vogue/Jenners are using the cultural appropriation accusations as click bait, to draw attention, especially in that case. What backlash are they talking about? I have virtually seen no-one criticize this picture. Of course if you look long and hard you'll always find dumb accusations like the quoted ones - they only included 2 comments altogether, it'd have been so easy to ignore them. But I guess they're getting the attention they wanted. Controversy is the Kardashians bread and butter - where would they be without it?

 

[TREVOFASHIONISTO]

this is so dumb and not even appropriation. I'm black and i'd never even call that an afro

 

[billiejbob]

Even Diet Prada has come to the defence of KJ and said how it's a reference to Alla Nazimova and we all know how much DP likes to call out cultural appropriation.
I feel like people who call this cultural appropriation or racist are actually inherently racist themselves because they're so focused on race rather than other references.

 

[Benn98]

Even Diet Prada has come to the defence of KJ and said how it's a reference to Alla Nazimova and we all know how much DP likes to call out cultural appropriation.

Yes! Alla Nazimova in Camille! Wow, look at Diet Prada! Who knew.........

 

[Benn98]

Natalia Vodianova for The Independent:

“For young models, it’s really, really hard. It’s really hard without this following. I know a lot of brands are asking models how many followers they have — this dictates whether they get the job or not,” she began. “It’s interesting because that means personality is celebrated and it’s not really about the brand’s ideal of the, let’s say, face. It’s crazy because very beautiful girls, or whatever that means, will miss out and the job will go out to someone who is very charismatic and funny and has a lot of personality.”

“It’s interesting because that means personality is celebrated and it’s not really about the brand's ideal of the, let’s say, face. It’s crazy because very beautiful girls, or whatever that means, will miss out and the job will go out to someone who is very charismatic and funny and has a lot of personality. Some people find it unfair but I think it’s interesting.”

 

[sore]

Natalia Vodianova for The Independent:

Not sure whether to laugh or cry about the Instagram = personality equation...
(Obviously this goes for the brands more than for Natalia.)