Tom Cruise & Katie Holmes

Status
Not open for further replies.
eternitygoddess said:
Where IS Suri?!

The suspense is killing me!!!

My money (and that of my work colleagues) is on the birth defect. I bet its something very small but because of this scientology cr*p, is obviously a big deal to Tom.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
^^^ it was on british tv the other day saying not even close friends and family have been aloud to see the pillow sorry baby yet
 
silk skin paws said:
The plot thickens <insert some mystery sounding music here>.I think scientology is behind this. Katie's full name is Katherine.

not to mention, tom's real/legal last name is mathapov, not cruise. i think connor and isabella (his adopted babies who we don't see much of, especially not since they announced katie was pregnant) are mathapovs... this is all a bit too fishy for me. plus, you can make birth certificates on photoshop if you so desire, and i have no doubt that the scientologists have something better than a photoshop.
 
Maybe eventually Tom will have to get rid of Katie like he did with Nicole; his publicity team could cook up a creative rumour, like, We did a DNA test and the child is not Tom's as he thought it was, Katie's a tramp, etc. and then Katie can be returned back to humanity.
 
US Weekly has a "where's suri" article in the current issue and apparently there is a follow up in the newest issue out this week. I swear Access Hollywood said the mag reported some hiker was out in Colorado and stumbled upon Katie out in the open apparently breast feeding the baby so that's suppose to be proof that there really is a baby. I laughed my *** off at that. I mean really? She's supposedly out in the woods breastfeeding a baby that no one in LA has managed to get a glimpse of?
 
style_savy said:
I think that perhaps the baby had a weird scientology birth and was never certified and this is a fake. Because Katie was fat and she definitely gave birth.

That's why I believe there really is a baby floating around somewhere. This is all too "Rosemary's baby" to me. :ninja:
 
I still think there never was a pregnancy, and that they are waiting for some sort of adoption to go through...

I hate that I have any opinion on this. That child is gonna be m-e-s-s-e-d up one day when she starts looking into the conspiracies surrounding her existence...

..I just hate myself for taking part. Sorry Suri. Where/whoever you are.
 
That's just so funny. They don't release a picture of Suri (like normal people would do), but they release a picture of her birth certificate. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Don't they know that there is this programme called photoshops widely availalbe for few bucks?! :lol:
 
canuckcutie said:
US Weekly has a "where's suri" article in the current issue and apparently there is a follow up in the newest issue out this week. I swear Access Hollywood said the mag reported some hiker was out in Colorado and stumbled upon Katie out in the open apparently breast feeding the baby so that's suppose to be proof that there really is a baby. I laughed my *** off at that. I mean really? She's supposedly out in the woods breastfeeding a baby that no one in LA has managed to get a glimpse of?

I don't buy it. :lol: If Suri does exist then something is seriously wrong. :(
 
style_savy said:
I think that perhaps the baby had a weird scientology birth and was never certified and this is a fake. Because Katie was fat and she definitely gave birth.

Donuts and Ice Cream can make someone gain a few pounds for "motherly curves" and really good Hollywood makeup technicians can make convincing fake baby bellies :innocent:

I mean, Brad and Angelina are arguably the most private couple in Hollywood- they don't hardly aknowledge their existance as a couple- and even they released baby pics. I don't trust this situation one little bit. :unsure:
 
It seems like a couple with their level of fame and the paparazzi attention that comes along with it wouldn't be able to avoid having a picture of their baby taken. Don't they have to take the baby to check ups, take her to visit friends, take her to the Scientology center, take her anywhere outside the house?
 
Did Mimi Rogers get Tom Cruise into Scientology?


Like one of most famous lines ever written: too bad she created a monster.
Seriously, I respect his religions beliefs and everything but all this sh*t involving a BABY and a girl who looks a teenage bride, seriously it's scary...
 
I don't understand the whole "hiding baby from the press" thing. Babies don't understand the paparazzi for a start, secondly they change so drastically between the ages of 0 and 5, thirdly, they only use the privacy as an excuse (usually) to hide a none-too-sightly baby with a face only a mother could love. I became suspicious when I saw the nursing bra flapping in the wind. It was too deliberate. Far too deliberate.
 
misssakura said:
I don't understand the whole "hiding baby from the press" thing. Babies don't understand the paparazzi for a start, secondly they change so drastically between the ages of 0 and 5, thirdly, they only use the privacy as an excuse (usually) to hide a none-too-sightly baby with a face only a mother could love. I became suspicious when I saw the nursing bra flapping in the wind. It was too deliberate. Far too deliberate.

you are so right about the nursing bra. that's what I thought too. There is NO baby but she's breastfeeding something...something...
 
KhaoticKharma said:
Donuts and Ice Cream can make someone gain a few pounds for "motherly curves" and really good Hollywood makeup technicians can make convincing fake baby bellies :innocent:

I mean, Brad and Angelina are arguably the most private couple in Hollywood- they don't hardly aknowledge their existance as a couple- and even they released baby pics. I don't trust this situation one little bit. :unsure:

Yes but Brangelina did that to rake in millions for their worldly causes.
 
Katie Holmes Parents won't be at the wedding

Katie Holmes' parents are reportedly refusing to attend her wedding to
fiancé Tom Cruise.

The 'Top Gun' actor plans to marry the 'Batman Begins' actress, the mother
of his daughter Suri, in a Scientology ceremony in late July or early
August.

However, Katie’s devoutly Catholic parents, Martin and Kathleen, will not
attend the nuptials because they do not approve of Tom’s devotion to the
bizarre sci-fi cult.

The ceremony will allegedly be conducted by Scientology leader David
Miscavige.

A family friend revealed to Life & Style magazine that Katie’s
mom and dad “are not happy” with their daughter’s choice of where to marry.

It is also claimed that the former 'Dawson's Creek' star had hoped to have a
separate Catholic wedding to appease her angry parents but Tom is not
willing to compromise.

According to the source, Martin Holmes allegedly said: “If Katie can have a
proper Catholic wedding her whole family will gladly be a part of.”

Since she began dating Tom, Katie has become heavily involved in
Scientology, and is reputedly planning to convert from Catholicism to the
'religion'.

Recently, Tom’s ex-wife Nicole Kidman was told by the Catholic Church that,
in their eyes, she had never been married to the actor as it had not been
sanctioned by the church.

Suri's Birth Certificate Mystery

Why did a "friend" sign Suri's birth certificate instead of the parents?
Why did the nurse sign it as opposed to the doctor?
Also, why was it filed 20 days later?

hollywoodrag.com
 
^^Katie's fate is sealed. Tom is so isolating her.

Some collection of weird sightings.


http://entertainment1.sympatico.msn.ca/Celebs/Gossip/Articles/Is+Katie+Pregnant+Again.htm

But the under-wraps infant apparently enjoyed plenty of fresh air during the high-altitude getaway (Cruise has a home in the area), at least if you believe a few eyewitness accounts, including one that claims Katie engaged in an invigorating trek in the woods, tot in tow.

According to the magazine, a hiker happened upon the supposedly future Mrs. Cruise as she was breastfeeding Suri along a trail. Alas, the surprised outdoor enthusiast failed to capture the momentous moment for posterity (and by "momentous moment," we mean the rarely unaccompanied Katie roaming around freely, not the al fresco nursing).

A waitress also claims to have glimpsed the elusive ankle-biter, gushing, "She exists! I saw her thick black hair." The magazine quotes locals as saying Suri has "small hands" and is "funny-looking," traits that pretty much describe every baby ever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,085
Messages
15,208,495
Members
87,041
Latest member
balticdolly
Back
Top