I can't believe that the editorial team got away with a story that overtly exposes and even promotes such racist stereotypes. The one time they chose to cast an amazing variety of black models they had to play with a tired concept; the only reason why they are honestly here in this story is to play up the stereotype of black people as anonymous, sexual, savage beings who here play back up dancer to Daria (the white person)...not for the real reasons that they should be there, because they are buzz worthy and up and coming.
Just look at the way Daria is lit and being handled by the male models, and compare the styling of her high-end, colourful pieces with Ajak's bikini for example. There is a clear isolation between her and the other models. If they had had an Asian model like Liu or Lakshmi casted it might've softened the aesthetic tensions...but the connotations would still be very explicit even if the editorial featured all black models. I don't really know who to blame for going along with this...I think that Jansson and Michelle Lee are certainly to blame for not stopping to think about how redundant and offensive this was going to appear, but in particular Baron.
Interview is not Vogue...it's not a magazine that has always subliminally only catered to those white upper class consumers who are typically as the target customers of designer clothing. The editorial team have always promoted a variety of talent from different backgrounds, races, sexual orientations and class. Which is why I'm baffled they of all people would come up with something as backward as this. Maybe it's meant to be ironic, but there's certainly nothing pointing to any social critique in the photos.