Yes! Since yesterdayDid Avatar beat Titanic yet for highest grossing film of all time?



I think that that's appalling. Titanic was one of those majestic, unforgettable type of movies. It's one of those epic movies that, when you're old, you will reminisce on the time that you went to see Titanic on the big screen in 1997/1998. Whereas Avatar is more of a flash-in-the-pan and a sign of the times (can you say, "CGI overload"?).Yes! Since yesterday![]()
I'm late to the party, but I just saw it last Wednesday and reading the last two pages where several people cannot believe Avatar is nominated for an Oscar....how is that possible
Sure the story wasn't super strong and the acting wasn't revolutionary as well.
You just answered your question there.
Except, I would say the writing was laughable, the story was bland, cliche and unoriginal, the whole 'save the earth' politics was too heavy handed, and the acting (save for Zoe) was pretty dull.
The movie is visual effects. If you take that away, you have nothing.
Discrit 9 is often brought up by Avatar detractors as the superior Alien-themed movie and as hard as I try I can't see why.Besides if you're looking for cool visual effects, may I recommend District 9? A film that was made not for half a billion dollars, but for only 30 millions. And a movie that doesn't sacrifice acting and writing for cool special effects.
Which was exactly what it was aiming to be. Nothing more, nothing less.This has to be the most amazing experience I have ever had in a movietheatre.
Discrit 9 is often brought up by Avatar detractors as the superior Alien-themed movie and as hard as I try I can't see why.
The premise is good and clever and the first 40 mins of the movie are very interesting but after that point it looks like the writers simply gave up and it turns into a highly predictable shoot-em-up gore fest with typical action-movie dialogue
Discrit 9 is often brought up by Avatar detractors as the superior Alien-themed movie and as hard as I try I can't see why.
The premise is good and clever and the first 40 mins of the movie are very interesting but after that point it looks like the writers simply gave up and it turns into a highly predictable shoot-em-up gore fest with typical action-movie dialogue (the movie can basically be watched on mute after the first 40 mins, which isn't true of Avatar imo).
Which was exactly what it was aiming to be. Nothing more, nothing less.


But even if we agree with your premise that both District 9 and Avatar suffer from the same drawbacks, when you consider than one costs half a billion and the other costs only like 7% of that, shouldn't that alone make D9 the most inspiring movie?I did not really said that. I argued it was just as flawed. You may disagree.How can you say D9 was just as 'unoriginal' as Avatar?
If we are talking about what happens after the first 40 minutes, I can think of hundreds of examples.Point me to one movie that's substantially like D9?
The Pocahontas meme is tired and lazy. The Avatar scriptment was written before the Disney's movie came out and Pocahontas isn't an original story anyway.Avatar is EXACTLY like Pocahontas only in a different time frame.
He never said that. What he said he that it looked like nothing you've ever seen and that it would revolutionize the way movies are made.And I don't think all Avatar aimed to be because James Cameron acts like it's the best movie ever.
This just reinforce my impression that most people trashing the movie don't really have an issue with it but are just having a knee-jerk reaction to its most rabid fans and to its immense success.I would gladly accept it as just being a great experience, except the fans seem to think that it somehow qualifies the movie to be the best ever and deserving of Best Picture.
Which is to have been the first movie of its kind: a movie that influenced movie-making in a deep and lasting way.I will say this again, 10 years from now, people will realize the true value of Avatar.

- eonline.comIt's official: Zoë Saldana and Sam Worthington will reprise their roles as Neytiri and Jake Sully in the next three Avatar movies, E! News has confirmed.
Director James Cameron is making the sequels back-to-back-to-back, much like filmmaker Peter Jackson's The Hobbit fantasy series. The second Avatar movie will hit theaters in December 2016, with the third to follow in December 2017 and the fourth in December 2018.
"Jake Sully is a rare combination of passion, strength, street smarts and soul, which requires a lot from an actor. Sam brought to the role a combination of sensitivity, vulnerability and strength," Cameron said. "Zoë captured every aspect of the character I envisioned, bringing to Neytiri a mix of delicacy, fierceness and incredible physicality. I am beyond pleased they'll be returning with us to Pandora."
Saldana, 35, next appears in Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy and was recently cast in NBC's Rosemary's Baby miniseries. She will likely reprise her role as communications director Nyota Uhura in the next Star Trek movie, slated for release in 2016. Worthington, 37, can next be seen in the action movie Sabotage alongside Terrence Howard, Joe Manganiello and Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Stephen Lang, who played Marine Colonel Quaritch in the 2009 blockbuster, was the first actor to sign on for new Avatar installments. Given that his character died in the first film, it's unclear how he will return.
Cameron will direct and produce the Avatar films alongside his producing partner Jon Landau. He hired a team of screenwriters—War of the Worlds' Josh Friedman, Rise of the Planet of the Apes' Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver and Savages' Shane Salerno—to pen the scripts for each movie.
Avatar is the highest-grossing film at the box office of all time. Disney's Animal Kingdom recently began construction on a Pandora-themed attraction, which is tentatively scheduled to open in 2017.