The point I'm trying to make is that Julia's clientele are really not that diverse. She's not even that hypersuccessful to be used as an example of 'oh look, you can book tons of Vogues and have zero followers!' In most cases you'll find that it's either a Simons/Vanderperre/Meisel/Mcdean or Jackson gig that she books. That, for instance, cannot be leveraged against Arixona Muse, who worked with a vast and often random selection of people and editions.
Followers are a commodity as we speak. And weeping and wailing all over the place won't end it. Change will once again come from the inside. Hana's move was great and ballsy, but how many others will follow suit? I'm not for it at all, it's just that I rationalise that it's clearly an awful means to an equally awful end for most girls. And anyway, there were loads of other disgusting movements in modelling before this crass commercialism/popularity contest (p*rno and heroin chic with eerily young-looking girls taking the lead etc).
You may dislike Julia but you cannot say she is not hypersucessful. She has plenty of work outside the photographers you mentioned (off the top of my head - Givenchy, Marc Jacobs, Tiffany & Co, Lanvin, Diesel Black Gold, Louis Vuitton Spirit of Travel, Bottega Veneta fragrance, Zara, Boss, Paul Smith, Celine, Proenza, Saint Laurent, Vogue Germany, US Elle, W, Dazed, Vogue Paris, Interview, Voguye Japan, UK Vogue, Love etc etc). And that is just from memory and the work that she has that wasn't done by Meisel/Vanderperre/McDean/Simons/Jackson. No working model at the moment has a portfolio like her. You can't get much more hypersuccessful than literally beating every model out for campaigns year after year.
