Benn98
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2014
- Messages
- 42,528
- Reaction score
- 20,591
I too used to share this erroneous thinking, but then I realised that we are blaming the wrong party here. Kendall and Gigi cannot demand and get VP covers, they're enabled by Emmanuelle Alt or David Sims, or whoever. Now whether it all boils down to bribery (as DutchHomme will explain at length to anyone who will listen), their family ties, or sm clout, is really almost irrelevant. Fact of the matter is, the root of the problem is the fashion system who back them, not the actual girls. But all these comments actually target them personally, which I find odd. Is it because it's easier and less consequential to attack Kendall than Condè Nast? Of course they're rather lousy modelling. Why not talk about that instead?
@Modellove: Actually, you're right. I should think that as a feminist you are entitled to dislike other women. But it's a completely different ballgame when your comments verge to the point of inciting hate, or publicly tearing them down. This is not conducive to the 'feminist' cause at all. I say this of course from my lofty male ignorance, so excuse me if I'm getting the wrong end of the stick here.
I should also add that I deplore nepotism as much as you do, but my frustration is directed at Katie Grand, Karl or Chloe for instance, not Kendall or Theo Wenner.
@Modellove: Actually, you're right. I should think that as a feminist you are entitled to dislike other women. But it's a completely different ballgame when your comments verge to the point of inciting hate, or publicly tearing them down. This is not conducive to the 'feminist' cause at all. I say this of course from my lofty male ignorance, so excuse me if I'm getting the wrong end of the stick here.
I should also add that I deplore nepotism as much as you do, but my frustration is directed at Katie Grand, Karl or Chloe for instance, not Kendall or Theo Wenner.