Model Behavior (PLEASE READ POST #1 BEFORE POSTING)

[Deleted member 130879]

It doesn't negate what UK Vogue has done over the years in terms of its content, but I kinda don't see Naomi as the Martin Luther King of modelling, I'd presume petty self-interest before anything else. But I suppose that could be said of anyone.

She is the further from that and that's what is making me super angry. She's an hypocrite! She just recently shared a yoga picture and the news outlets shared as being herself depicted and she never, for once, posted anything giving any credit to the actual girl. She got so much hate from stealing the picture she had to delete it. And yet, not even one "I'm sorry". The girl was a black model/yoga instructor/dancer.

If her notion of diversity is stealing from less known POC and getting her celebrity friends with no credentials to work on a magazine...

 

[eizhowa]

She is the further from that and that's what is making me super angry. She's an hypocrite! She just recently shared a yoga picture and the news outlets shared as being herself depicted and she never, for once, posted anything giving any credit to the actual girl. She got so much hate from stealing the picture she had to delete it. And yet, not even one "I'm sorry". The girl was a black model/yoga instructor/dancer.

If her notion of diversity is stealing from less known POC and getting her celebrity friends with no credentials to work on a magazine...

Well, unless Naomi claimed that it was herself, the only thing she did wrong was to not give credit. I saw those pictures and it is very obvious that it is not Naomi.

 

[Deleted member 130879]

Well, unless Naomi claimed that it was herself, the only thing she did wrong was to not give credit. I saw those pictures and it is very obvious that it is not Naomi.

And isn't that enough? To use someone's image without their consent/tagging them/giving them credit is a crime. By not doing that she obviously let it go as if the picture was hers. And it was not. She used someone else's work/property. She was lucky the girl was "kind of" cool with it.

 

[eizhowa]

And isn't that enough? To use someone's image without their consent/tagging them/giving them credit is a crime. By not doing that she obviously let it go as if the picture was hers. And it was not. She used someone else's work/property. She was lucky the girl was "kind of" cool with it.

I have wondered what could be considered fair use on social media before (I have weird hobbies), and I am still not convinced that every uncredited repost on instagram is an infringement. From what I can gather, the deciding factor seems to be whether someone loses potential income because of the repost. I really don't know enough about the circumstances to know how I feel about this specific case.

Of course credit should be given because it is common courtesy (although that is generally lacking on social media), but I don't know that it is a crime.

 

[LostInNJ]

What Naomi posted could also be described as a photo of an office that refused to use her in their magazine because they no longer wanted to put up with what they deemed her unprofessional behaviour.

I'm sure if I was used to getting my own way, I'd not be fond of those who said no to me.

It doesn't negate what UK Vogue has done over the years in terms of its content, but I kinda don't see Naomi as the Martin Luther King of modelling, I'd presume petty self-interest before anything else. But I suppose that could be said of anyone.

Naomi has been outspoken for years regarding the lack of diversity in the modeling world overall, which extends itself in this situation as are looking at the bigger picture here. So, even if it was her giving the middle finger to the magazine that 'refused to use her [...] because they no longer wanted to put up with what they deemed her unprofessional behaviour' it isn't as tho this is the first time she has spoken out about this issue.

So, on that note, I will give her the benefit of doubt here

 

[dsamg]

I for one am convinced she sold her stuff to finance this boob job, or lips, or whatever else she had altered. I dunno, it's her business, she's allowed to change whatever she wants.
I'm certainly not buying that it was for a charity drive. Why not hand it over to them to broker the deal on Ebay? It would give her more time to twirl around on Italian patios with terribly dressed men while lifting her skirt for all of Instagram to see.



He did say that he was a prude, lol.

You are correct about the charity drive. She said herself that 'part' of the funds will go to charity. That means that the majority is for herself. I agree with you that she is definitely allowed to change whatever she wants. I just thought it was a pretty terrible job and looked very botched from that angle but perhaps some posters are correct that it just needs time to settle. In saying that, boob job speculation has been happening for months so I am pretty sure they are at least a few months old. Who knows.

Anywho, she does have some pretty nice stuff for sale if anyone is interested https://www.ebay.ph/sch/magfrack/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_ipg=&_from=

 

[modelista]

Svetlana Zakharova doing the quote "#bellahadidchallenge"

[

 

[Littleathquakes]

major shade

 

[khyrk]

What Naomi posted could also be described as a photo of an office that refused to use her in their magazine because they no longer wanted to put up with what they deemed her unprofessional behaviour.

I'm sure if I was used to getting my own way, I'd not be fond of those who said no to me.

It doesn't negate what UK Vogue has done over the years in terms of its content, but I kinda don't see Naomi as the Martin Luther King of modelling, I'd presume petty self-interest before anything else. But I suppose that could be said of anyone.

This is probably one of the reasons





On one of her trials:

Naomi: "No! Well I didn't really want to be here. So I was MADE to be here. So obviously I'm just like, wanting to get this over with and get on with my life. This is a Big Inconvenience for me."

 

[khyrk]

Naomi: Was I late today?

Barbara Walters: An hour and 20 mins.

Naomi: Oh dear. Well, I was on another job.

Barbara: Uhmmmmm. So was I.

Naomi:

 

[Benn98]

Well, bless Barbara for coming up with (imo at least) the ultimate reason why she's perpetually late - it's a power play. She seems to make it look like it's cute, it's not actually. I'm sure she's burned many bridges over the years with this tardy behaviour.

I will add that I'm also late most of the times, but it's simply because I try to cram way too much into my schedule.

 

[t-rex]

What is the "Bella Hadid challenge" ?

 

[Deleted member 130879]

What is the "Bella Hadid challenge" ?

Probably shade over Bella's "tragic" runway walk.

 

[Littleathquakes]

For reals re: Naomi. Talking about breaking stereotypes and promoting diversity/inclusion meanwhile perpetuating CPT.

 

[ThatDudeOverTher]

The fashion should be the focus, but I live for the industry drama.

Naomi Campbell vs British Vogue
Everyone will be talking about Naomi Campbell shading British Vogue on Instagram. The 46-year-old supermodel didn’t just shade British Vogue, she threw the whole damn tree at them. Naomi posted an image from British Vogue’s September issue depicting the magazine’s staff under former Editor-in-Chief, Alexandra Schulman. Not a single person of color was in the picture, which prompted the post.

bonneny.com

 

[Runabout]

What is the "Bella Hadid challenge" ?

Wait, I didn't know it exists. Was it trending somewhere at some point?

 

[fashionista-ta]

^ You too have the talent to take part

 

[khyrk]

L’Oreal Fires Transgender Model Over Racism Tweets

The beauty giant L’Oreal has cut all ties with the transgender model Munroe Bergdorf after uncovering remarks she published about racism.

"Honestly I don’t have energy to talk about the racial violence of white people any more. Yes ALL white people. Because most of ya’ll don’t even realise or refuse to acknowledge that your existence, privilege and success as a race is built on the backs, blood and death of people of colour.
Your entire existence is drenched in racism."



http://thatgrapejuice.net/entertainment/loreal-fires-transgender-model-racism-tweets/

 

[khyrk]

 

[khyrk]

^

claraamfo Not even a week ago I was proud to announce that I was to be in the same campaign as Munroe. A trans woman of colour who @lorealmakeup hired to sell make up because of who she is. Who she is, a woman who wrote a nuanced post on institutional racism and white supremacy in relation to Charlottesville and how the foundations of those heinous ideals trickle in to every facet of our society. A newspaper took her post out of context and span it as "a rant" with the most basic of dog whistle politics to rally people against her. She has now been dropped from the campaign because L'Oreal feel that she is "at odds with our values".....If she's not "worth it" anymore, I guess I'm not either. #IStandWithMunroe