Model Behavior (PLEASE READ POST #1 BEFORE POSTING)

I do not buy it about Carmen. Doesn’t sound like her from what I deduce her character to be like. I love Eugenia, but not sure about her. Sad if there’s any truth to either story.
I do :lol::ninja:.. something about her back in the day, the 'sense of humor' that's only funny if you think she's hot (remember the mini uproar when she called the crew of a photo shoot 'the little people'? lmao), running for a seat at the EU parliament? I definitely think Vogue's strategy of making it seem like Carmen was a threat to Gisele's skyrocketing career was a weird attempt to maintain momentum but if she bought into that (and.. she was gullible enough to think she was remotely ready for politics with just chess training and high school), and if you add Gisele's fake modesty and strict marketing ('opening/closing or not walking the show) rubbing her colleagues the wrong way, then.. yeah, the child actor tantrum is ON.

I don't think pictures mean much. We all take pictures with mean relatives/co-workers/people who were mean ages ago for multiple reasons other than wanting to document the luv, sometimes you just move on..
 
I do :lol::ninja:.. something about her back in the day, the 'sense of humor' that's only funny if you think she's hot (remember the mini uproar when she called the crew of a photo shoot 'the little people'? lmao), running for a seat at the EU parliament? I definitely think Vogue's strategy of making it seem like Carmen was a threat to Gisele's skyrocketing career was a weird attempt to maintain momentum but if she bought into that (and.. she was gullible enough to think she was remotely ready for politics with just chess training and high school), and if you add Gisele's fake modesty and strict marketing ('opening/closing or not walking the show) rubbing her colleagues the wrong way, then.. yeah, the child actor tantrum is ON.

I don't think pictures mean much. We all take pictures with mean relatives/co-workers/people who were mean ages ago for multiple reasons other than wanting to document the luv, sometimes you just move on..

Humm, I was not aware of this photoshoot. Oh well if it’s true then ok lol. I’m feeling very disappointed by people lately. -_-:neutral::wacko:
 
Anway do you know guys why Linda and Naomi dont follow each other on instagram anymore? Is there any issue between them?
Noticed this since her British Vogue covers , lots of models don't follow Naomi anymore Leomie Anderson Jourdan Dunn Joans Smalls Anais Mali and the list goes on.. something happened but I dont know what is it
 
Maybe jealousy. I've never been a fan of Naomi, since 90s. I always prefered Yasmeen instead of Naomi but she has been everywhere because of Christy and Linda as part of trinity even she was in shadow through 90s of these two. Its no doubt Naomi is great model, but her personality is weird. Since 2000s she is a leading model as part of trinity so maybe she has fear to be again in shadow. She seems to me real immature in her instagram posts and comments
 
Agreed that it's weird they aren't following each other on IG anymore, but we have no idea if that's just a technicality or some simpler reason. It's amazing that people automatically attack Naomi as the reason for any potential split in their friendship. It's also crazy that she's being compared to another minority model as the preferred vs. less-preferred model.
 
Anway do you know guys why Linda and Naomi dont follow each other on instagram anymore? Is there any issue between them?
This is a new development, just adding some oil to the fire:

Linda just shared a BLM post on her Instagram. No doubt in response to to Kanye wearing a WLM shirt to his show yesterday. And Naomi walked the show…
 
Linda and Naomi no longer follow each other on Instagram, does anyone know what happened? :cry:
 
Gisele has problem...

A Lot Of People Will Lose a Lot of Money — Including Tom Brady and Gisele


If there’s no one around to buy FTX, that means that a whole lot of people are going to lose money. If the firm goes into bankruptcy, people who bought stakes in the company will probably be wiped out. This means that not only faceless venture capital firms like Sequoia and SoftBank are likely to lose the entirety of their investments, but also Tom Brady and Gisele Bündchen, who sank an undisclosed amount of money into the company and, in exchange, received fake-sounding jobs (“brand ambassador” and “environmental & social initiatives adviser”) and fake money (very probably FTT tokens, the cryptocurrency issued by Bankman-Fried’s exchange that has since plummeted in value).


But it’s not just VCs and other supervillains who are out of luck. Among the investors that are down is Canada’s third-largest pension fund. And those who have accounts may have to wait years to get their money back — and who knows how much liquidators will be able to recover. Then there are about $8 billion in loans outstanding, according to the initial report on Alameda’s balance sheet. A few companies have tweeted out that they’re exposed to the firm, but the repercussions of those connections are still to be determined.
nymag.com
 
Gisele has deleted the instagram post with the commercial for FTX. I'm not sure she's dumb enough to demand compensation in the form of tokens rather than cash. Wasn't it a 20 million dollar endorsement fee?
 
There's a story in the Daily Beast today about Gisele and Tom's finances and self dealing-involved in their charities.

In short don't donate to Gisele's or Tom's charities - they may keep most of the money for themselves and they may be breaking the law and they may be breaching fiduciary duty.

Here's an excerpt:
Brady and Bündchen, who alone is worth $400 million, were previously called out in a New York Post report for donating only a sliver of their wealth to their own charities—including the Luz Foundation, of which Bündchen is president. Gisele Inc., a company owned by Bündchen, donated $350,647 to her nonprofit’s coffers in 2019. That year, records show, Luz’s sole $80,000 donation went to a Bon and Tibetan Buddhist group formerly known as “Pointing Out The Great Way Foundation.”

Financial data from the IRS, posted on ProPublica’s Nonprofit Explorer, reveal the Luz Foundation’s revenues skyrocketed to more than $5 million in 2020, while its expenses totaled just $280,948. Bündchen’s representatives could not be reached for comment, and an accountant for the charity declined to comment.

Whole story here
 
Can someone please explain to me what is the problem with Gisele taxes? Is it like Shakira? I really dont understand how this works in America, im brazilian! Thanks!
 
Can someone please explain to me what is the problem with Gisele taxes? Is it like Shakira? I really dont understand how this works in America, im brazilian! Thanks!

Gisele's wealth has been estimated at 400 million. I'm not sure if Gisele pays taxes in the US or in Costa Rica. (Costa Rica has a flat tax which may be more beneficial for her) The issue is that she's donating part of her salary to her own charity (for a tax write-off) and then her own charity keeps most of the money never distributing it or sends $ to friends' organizations. This is against the law in the US and the government can investigate/suspend the charity.

Shakira's problem is different. Shakira doesn't want to pay income taxes. Shakira lives in Spain but claims to spend 6 months and two days of the year in the Bahamas. She claims she is a Bahamas resident not a Spanish resident. People in the Bahamas pay no income taxes. Tax officials in Spain have looked at her private flight itineraries, paparazzi images and attendance at Spanish football events and determined that she lives in Spain for more than 6 months of the year making her a Spanish resident.

Shakira agreed to pay back taxes she owed the Spanish government and a fine but now says it was mistake and wants the money back. She says she is a victim. She will not admit guilt and will go trial for fraud.

Here's a recent associated press/npr story about Shakira here:

Shakira will face a tax-fraud trial in Spain

BARCELONA, Spain — A Spanish judge on Tuesday approved a trial for Colombian pop singer Shakira on charges of tax fraud.

Spanish prosecutors accused the entertainer in 2018 of failing to pay 14.5 million euros ($13.9 million) in taxes on income earned between 2012 and 2014. Prosecutors are seeking an eight-year prison sentence and a hefty fine if she is found guilty of tax evasion.

Shakira, 45, has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and rejected a deal with authorities to avoid going to trial. Her public relations firm has said that she has already paid all that she owed and an additional 3 million euros ($2.8 million) in interest.

The court based in the town of Esplugues de Llobregat near Barcelona said that Shakira will face six counts of tax fraud. The date for the trial has yet to be set.

The case hinges on where Shakira lived during 2012-14. Prosecutors in Barcelona have alleged the Grammy winner spent more than half of that period in Spain and should have paid taxes in the country, even though her official residence was in the Bahamas.

Shakira, whose full name is Shakira Isabel Mebarak Ripoll, has been linked to Spain since she started dating soccer player Gerard Pique. The couple, who have two children, used to live together in Barcelona but recently ended their 11-year relationship.

Spain has cracked down on soccer stars like Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo over the past decade for not paying their full due in taxes. They were found guilty of evasion but both avoided prison time thanks to a provision that allows a judge to waive sentences under two years in length for first-time offenders.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,702
Messages
15,196,703
Members
86,687
Latest member
Fatedtime
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->