UK Vogue May 2016 : Kate Moss by Craig McDean

[8eight]

source : dailymail.co.uk

 

[MON]

It looks like an H&M Supplement...

 

[WilliamsLe010919]

it amazes me that they always find something to write about Kate Moss

 

[Avogadro]

^lol,

 

[zzzyao76]

I like it, it's her 37th British Vogue Cover i think.

 

[A.D.C.]

Hmmm I like it but it seems like an old cover I'm seeing again. It's like deja vu.

 

[elle_gb]

The cover looks generic but the next picture looks pretty damn good to me.

 

[honeycombchild]

Ah. Well. I suppose we'd gotten away with not having her turn up for far too long. Probably the longest it's been without her getting a cover.

Same old, same old. Blah, blah, blah. The editing on her face too, regardless of how good a model Kate may be / once was, I know fine well that's how she looks now. Perhaps it's the quality of the image but that's some serious post production work on her face there.

 

[Benn98]

God, this is so bland! Like it was done in such a haste. The empty space above her head is bothering me because it's not the style of British Vogue. I guess they'll save their annual beachy cover for June as per usual.

 

[KateTheGreatest]

Very boring, I feel like I've seen this before ...
Also I'm tired of Kate, she doesn't bring anything new to the table anymore.

 

[TeeVanity]

Yeah, not excited about this.

 

[fluxxx]

actually it's been quite a while we haven't seen her on the cover of VUK. The shot is generic tho

 

[Miss Dalloway]

She can do so much better, but this is not that bad either.

 

[dfl-001]

Completely booooooring
If not for Photoshop, she would not be working these days.

 

[TaylorBinque]

Kate Moss on Vogue UK cover, groundbreaking! At least they can push it a bit. It's like they are not even trying.

 

[honeycombchild]

Now I'm having a second look at it, I also can't believe a rhinestone studded Rolling Stones tee has made the cover of Vogue. Who knew it was 2002 again.

 

[vogue28]

McDean was reported as the photographer on The Mirror's website early this morning, but Vogue's site now states Mert Alas and Marcus Piggott are the photographers who shot Kate..

Anyway, regardless of who shot this cover, it's a total disappointment. As much as I'm a fan of Kate's, this Vogue cover isn't exactly her most finest and is very generic, mundane and tiresome. Kate's cover for the Olympics was so much more dynamic, Vogue-worthy and stimulating.

Guess this rules out Kate as the cover star for British Vogue's momentous June 2016 edition, celebrating their 100th anniversary!

 

[Miss Dalloway]

^ Mert & Marcus are taking over, so many Vogue covers this year!

Her pose on this cover reminds me of her previous cover for them by McDean!

 

[Benn98]

Guess this rules out Kate as the cover star for British Vogue's momentous June 2016 edition, celebrating their 100th anniversary!

That, for me, is great news! Although truth be told, I cannot think of anyone other than Kate Moss or the duchess who they'd want for that cover.

 

[vogue28]

^ Mert & Marcus are taking over, so many Vogue covers this year!

Vogue's now edited their article and it was indeed Craig McDean who shot the cover!