The only picture I like is the one where she is wearing Gucci. Simplicity suit her best. Too much photoshop on the other pictures and esp on the cover (she looks better with less), the concept may be interesting but it definitely doesn't suit her and yes great case of dead eyes (again) and she has her mouth open (again). That being said it's probably one of her best solo photoshoot since the Twilight stuff. Definitely better than Vogue US and as good as UK Elle.
Holy crap is that her?
I couldn't give a toss here about photoshop and I certainly couldn't give a toss about Twilight.........all I know for definite is that is one amazing cover and Kristen looks gorgeous. She looks like she just stepped out of Valley of the Dolls.
A big fat WOW! from me.
I think it looks great, but doesn't look anything like her. I think she's pretty enough -- if it looked more like her then I'd appreciate it more. I think Kristen is a very attractive young woman.
*Screams out to the heavens* Why, oh why, of all people, they put her on the cover of what will be my first W magazine under subscription. I am so tired of her; I detest her as an actress and I detest how so many high-fashion magazines give her the cover. I tell you, when Twilight first came out and she her face was everywhere, I went on a magazine strike. *Groan* She doesn't even look anything like herself, which may be a good thing.
I am extremely confused by this. It's a nice cover and it looks vaguely like her... but in some of the other shots I can't see her in them! Very weird.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.