Imagine being Angelina and reading this and realising you can make grown adults fight.. given all the humanitarian work she has done and all the perspective that has most likely given her, this must seem even more ridiculous. in fact, it is even more ridiculous. Whether you like her or not, whatever your thoughts on her, why don't you guys take some of this energy you're expending on this useless debate and direct it to a more meaningful pursuit... e.g. learning something new about the people and communities whose stories deserve to be told..
We could all use a little perspective here.. whatever Angelina's motives, i can bet she is far more educated than most of us on the issues she dedicates herself to, and instead of picking apart her words and choices, i think we'd be better off paying attention to the non-Hollywood situations she involves herself in and debating about those issues... issues that affect millions of people worldwide and that we should be thinking more about. Who cares if she sometimes contradicts herself....don't we all? i know it's the angelina and brad gossip thread but really, there is a point of ridiculousness and i think it's been reached here..
I usually agree with you but I think you have Angelina confused with Kirsten Stewart here.Complaining about how annoying it is to be famous, while still raking it in and seeming to enjoy it.
I usually agree with you but I think you have Angelina confused with Kirsten Stewart here.
Jolie is one of the few celebrities who don't indulge in the 'Oh, my life is so hard! I wish I was a waitress!' self-indulgent B.S.
Everytime she talks about being an actress it's to say how lucky she is, how much fun she has and how the money she earns allow her to invest in projects that matter to her.
The only thing she ever complain about is the tabloids, and even then she is more dismissive/sarcastic than bitter; and when you see the kind of drivel they put out, it's difficult to blame her.
Latest example, the US Weekly cover:
I was curious about that article because it's a serialisation of the Andrew Morton biography. I suspected the bio would be pretty much worthless but the extracts just confirm my hunch. You can read the article here.
I am not even going to linger on the headline (as if a man can be stolen they obviously know their female readership and want to sell the temptress/man-stealing-hussy angle. The hilarious thing is that they make such a poor case for it.
So what salacious techniques Angelina used to lure away a 'happily' married man?
Well, according to Andrew Morton, she presented herself to Brad as a sexy humanitarian mother. Never mind that she is, in fact, a sexy humanitarian mother. What Morton is in essence saying is that she was herself and Brad happened to fell for the person she is. And apparently that makes her the Wh*** of Babylon and Machiavelli rolled into one.
It's like that every single week.
All these things that Angela stole Brad nonsense somehow makes Aniston seem like a horrible person. I dont know why but i like her less and less all the time.
I know she has nothing to do with these tabloids but still.
isn't it "funny" how the masses tha read US Weekly want to believe its Angelina that seduced brad, when in reality it was brad chasing her around the world
I usually agree with you but I think you have Angelina confused with Kirsten Stewart here.
Jolie is one of the few celebrities who don't indulge in the 'Oh, my life is so hard! I wish I was a waitress!' self-indulgent B.S.
Everytime she talks about being an actress it's to say how lucky she is, how much fun she has and how the money she earns allow her to invest in projects that matter to her.
The only thing she ever complain about is the tabloids, and even then she is more dismissive/sarcastic than bitter; and when you see the kind of drivel they put out, it's difficult to blame her.
Latest example, the US Weekly cover:
I was curious about that article because it's a serialisation of the Andrew Morton biography. I suspected the bio would be pretty much worthless but the extracts just confirm my hunch. You can read the article here.
I am not even going to linger on the headline (as if a man can be stolen they obviously know their female readership and want to sell the temptress/man-stealing-hussy angle. The hilarious thing is that they make such a poor case for it.
So what salacious techniques Angelina used to lure away a 'happily' married man?
Well, according to Andrew Morton, she presented herself to Brad as a sexy humanitarian mother. Never mind that she is, in fact, a sexy humanitarian mother. What Morton is in essence saying is that she was herself and Brad happened to fell for the person she is. And apparently that makes her the Wh*** of Babylon and Machiavelli rolled into one.
It's like that every single week.