mikeijames
no tom ford, no thanks.
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2003
- Messages
- 5,879
- Reaction score
- 8
does this mean that Julia will finally stop having a pseudo reason to be at every front row!
not unless the restoin-roitfelds suddenly misplaced all their money.
does this mean that Julia will finally stop having a pseudo reason to be at every front row!
Personally, I've always found it rather ironic that Anna Wintour is constantly derided for sticking to the same formula (classic American sportswear, same five to ten models, studio shots with goofy expressions shot by Demarchlier/studio shots with crazy hair shot by Meisel), when really, Carine has been doing the exact same thing- just with primarily French designers a lot more skin.![]()
besides, Julia became quite a tastemaker in the past few years, not to mention a pretty successful model with several campaigns under her belt already.
I'd have rather prefered reading "basic it-girl whose mother is VP's EIC which explains why she got campaigns" but I guess that's a way too long adjective 
that's not true. with American Vogue, i always have the issue that is seems to be 'one page - one designer', pretty much the same styling and combination as seen on the runway, just on a different girl (if that) and in a different location.
Carine, at her best, filled her magazine with editorials where the models would wear a mixture of different brands, mixing high and low (i remember one, i think the model had a huge afro, and she wore a Haute Couture jacket with a pair of jeans from H&M). imo Vogue Paris presented a way to wear those individual designer pieces, standout pieces, to combine and mix & match.
Vogue US generally lacks that kind of fun imo.


i'd never say she actually DESERVED those campaigns (she's quite basic, even tho Tom Ford Black Orchid image make her look INCREDIBLE!). all i'm saying is that she DID get those campaigns (through whichever means) and that therefore she's in the public's eye.

i have been secretly afraid for some time now that they would try to do some sort of makeover at italian vogue actually...
because that is perhaps one of their least profitable publications, in terms of
I'm bummed Carine leaving.The last few VP issues didn't float my boat but I think I might miss seeing Daria or Lara on the cover of VP every other month..
^^ Noooooooo!!! I don't want to see celebs on VP covers. It's enough to see them in US and British Vogue. For me VP and VI are great, because they DON'T use celebrities. And if they do, they choose well. No crap, just beautiful stories.
The worst part of this is, that probably magazine will be changed. And probably not in a good way. I'm tired of all those conservative mags, that don't deliver any emotions. VP was outstanding. And I will miss that for sure.
I remember Franca Sozzani mentioned in interview with Aliona Doletskaya that Vogue Italia is one of the best-selling Vogue's and especially in New-York it's best selling foreign magazine (not only among fashion titles)
^ Yes but sadly I think Julia will continue to show up meaninglessly.
^perhaps models on the cover appeal more to the subscriber crowd where celebrities grab the newsstand crowd better. as much as people complain, i do believe american vogue has achieved a balance in the type of celebrities it chooses to place on its cover. i believe vogue paris could do the same. there exist many celebrities who have selling power, but could present the right amount of edge to satisfy the core vogue paris crowd.