Perhaps that was the perception of some, but she had the press & public eating out of her hand even then.
Exactly. I don't know where Boomer got his info because Diana-mania is the the stuff of legend.
She was a media phenomenon and public obsession from day one. She actually made the sloaney style fashionable and her haircut was copied by thousands of British girls. There were Diana look-alike competitions all over the UK, she was on the cover of newspapers every other day, etc. It was insanity.
She wasn't considered frumpy at first, more like a sweet ingenue (especially after that nursery picture).The dress she wore at her first public gala was considered risque for a Royal at the time. The criticisms about her fashion sense (and her lapse in popularity) came much later.
What she lacked in self-confidence she more then made up in raw charisma. In comparison, Kate can barely shift copies and the British public is hardly obsessing.
Last thing the poor Brits need is another Zoe clone ...
I completely agree Kate has the potential to do so much better.
One cannot grow charisma but mystique and glamour can be manufactured (as Hollywood has shown us countless times). With the right team, she can create a memorable look.
The pictures I am talking about (both are iconic BTW
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fimg88.imageshack.us%2Fimg88%2F370%2Fprincessdianaasnanny198.jpg&hash=f3bf1cee28a214058f7f72a389d23ba7)
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fimg24.imageshack.us%2Fimg24%2F3552%2Fdianadress.jpg&hash=0d930e0e659810db09ab1a911cb1d4cc)
lisawallerrogers.files.wordpress.com, blogs.timeslive.co.za