for many many years now we've seen great creators like galliano, mcqueen, jean paul, or even tom ford or miuccia prada send hundreds of weird looking models down the runway... impossible dresses, and volumes, and colours, and exposed flesh, and purple nipples, and unwearable shoes... yet we all know that by the time all these pieces got to the showrooms and then the department stores and the boutiques, there was no more than a slight essence of the runway look that had been translated into perfectly wearable pieces that were luckily just as flawless... i think we can expect lovely fitting jackets, and maybe more opaque dresses... and about the ones with the different lenghts... maybe they'll just chop the tail off
i guess that's why in a way i cant help but being greatly surprised by the concern some members like
tricotineacetat have expressed on the wearability... let's just think of this as a greatly enjoyable fashion show... still several months to go until we find any version of these in stores
i think the nina ricci woman isnt far from a balenciaga woman or a givenchy woman, the balmain woman... she is of course much softer and girlier (she is not the rock concert babe the others can be at times)... but she is just as daring as they are. in the past three seasons since his debut, he has showed clothes that appeal from younger "girls" (and that would be his first) to older woman (this winter)... maybe this is in between. maybe it doesnt have the somewhat comfy-easy-non restrictive-wearable allure of the first collection... maybe it's more mature, confident, sexual, fiercer...
maybe this is his approach to a more post-modern romantic woman (in terms of passional beyond rationality and functionality)
i think there is a market for this proposition and i hope we'll see a lot of this in eds and stars and the streets ultimately/hopefully in the months to come