I'm surprised at how much love people are showing for this collection-- even the fashion-hardened critics: It's a weak collection by Muiccia's standards. I hate the literal cartoony car prints, they're kitschy and sloppy in design. I loathe the flame prints; it's cheap-looking, no matter the material, colorway, reference, or designer. Cheap is cheap.
The shoes with the tail-lights and gleaming flames is too gimmicky, and like Alejandro, I instantly thought
Jeremy Scott, someone whom I would never thought to associate with the amazing Muiccia.
If all the gimmicks where stripped away, what's left is a very pretty collection, very Muiccia, very classic Prada, but nothing really new to talk about. The silhouette and separate pieces are her signatures; The knee-length full skirt in accordion-pleats, the twin-sets, the full-cut opera coats, and the classic sleek strappy heels (minus the flame and tail-light embellishments) worn with the antique-style jewelry. Even the hairstyle is hers. The girls are like Muiccia-clones. Too bad the silliness of sloppily slapped on cartoon cars-as-gimmicks got in the way.
Muiccia's done 50's "pretty" so much better, stronger, and brilliantly for her S/S 2009 collection. This time, it just felt lazy.
fashioncopious.typepad.com