-
Announcing... The 2nd Annual theFashionSpot Awards. Vote NOW via the links below:
Designer of the Year
Ready-to-Wear Collection of the Year
Haute Couture Collection of the Year
Model of the Year
Magazine Cover of the Year
Ad Campaign of the Year
Thank you for participating!
VOTING WILL CLOSE 27/12/2024 EOD!
Stella McCartney for H&M
- Thread starter Atelier
- Start date
STELLA'S NEXT PLAN
STELLA MCCARTNEY's H&M range did just what she wanted for the brand. "[It] was an exercise in branding," Marco Bizzarri, ceo of the company, told WWD. "There is such an awareness out there of Stella's name, but until now, I don't know how many people could actually link Stella's name to a product. Plus it's not easy to find our products: We have three stand-alone stores and 200 wholesale accounts. We simply wanted a wider audience to understand the brand, to link the name to Stella's design and quality. At the very least, we've educated consumers – and piqued their curiosity – about Stella's world. Those same women who bought from H&M may well walk into Stella's store looking for the fragrance, a T-shirt, a pair of jeans or the Adidas trainers." Don't expect to see another collaboration with H&M though – since the next project is accessories. "We plan to show our first collection of bags and shoes to the trade in January," went on Bizzari. "Obviously, at McCartney, we're not working with leather, and non-leather accessories is a whole different business. It's a more difficult one, for sure, but we think we're in a unique position, and we're ready to exploit our strengths." With Stella's sales expected to grow in excess of £20 million for the fiscal year ending January 31, her parent company Gucci Group says she is going the right way about breaking a profit by the 2007 deadline. "Stella is absolutely on the profitability track," said James McArthur, executive vice president of Gucci Group. "This company is operating on so many different levels. The world of Stella is taking shape." (November 21 2005, AM)
liberty33r1b
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2003
- Messages
- 24,305
- Reaction score
- 691
^interesting, thanks for posting.
i agree her name has become almost a household name now, i'm glad her business is moving onward again!
i agree her name has become almost a household name now, i'm glad her business is moving onward again!
msminicooper
Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2005
- Messages
- 75
- Reaction score
- 0
lucy92 said:
Good for her...while I am not her biggest fan in terms of design (even though I LOVE LOVE LOVE my H&M trenchcoat) I think she has good, quirky ideas and her branding is excellent. She deserves to do well especially since she doesn't keep rehashing vintage ideas unlike Ms Philo, Stella's clothes are very modern.
Go Stella!
emi25 said:
Yep...I just went to the Milan store on my lunch break. I didn't think there'd be anything left by now, but it's all there, in all the sizes (not the whole collection though).... and I was the only person in the section they'd set aside. Some of the stuff was alright but I actually found some things I liked better in the normal part of the store!
critical story about the collection. has great pics. check it out here
http://www.slate.com/id/2130603/?nav=tap3
Selling Out
Why you can't buy H&M's Stella McCartney collection.
By Julia Turner
Posted Monday, Nov. 21, 2005, at 8:49 PM ET
When elite designers first linked arms with mass-market retail chains, the driving impulse was populist. The architect Michael Graves helped kick off the trend in 1999 when he signed up to create housewares for Target; his idea was to make well-designed products available to people of modest means. Subsequent collaborations—between Target and Philippe Starck, Cynthia Rowley, and Isaac Mizrahi; between JCPenney and Nicole Miller; between H&M and Karl Lagerfeld—have also been framed in rhetoric that conveys a sense of aesthetic noblesse oblige.
H&M's most recent collaboration, with Stella McCartney, seemed to be no exception. In a presale press release, McCartney said she wanted to offer "a wider female audience" a line that is "attractively priced yet offers high quality together with a superb fit and details." But when McCartney's collection debuted earlier this month, it sold out within hours. So, in truth, the defining characteristic of McCartney's clothes for H&M is not that they're cheap, or even that they're well-designed. It's that you can't have them. Those skinny jeans that retailed for $69.90? They're about as hard to acquire as an Hermès Birkin bag.
H&M intended the line to sell out quickly. While Graves' first collection for Target featured more than 150 styles, McCartney's collection for H&M included about 40. And while Mizrahi has produced several lines for Target, the McCartney collection was a one-off: H&M made no plans to restock its stores after the initial run sold out. The strategy had already proven successful: Last year, bargain-hunting style hounds devoured a limited edition collection from Karl Lagerfeld the morning it hit the floor, and the fashion press had a ball covering the fracas. H&M was clearly looking to re-create that frenzy.
The plan worked. When McCartney's clothes debuted earlier this month at stores in the United States and Europe, bemused accounts appeared in papers across the globe. The Daily Mail's piece was headlined "Stellamania!" (in a nod to her famous dad); the New York Post ran with "H&M Hordes 'Rack' Havoc With War Cry: 'Back Off My Dress, b*tch!' " Most pieces noted that shoppers arrived impressively early, stood in impressively long lines and indulged in nasty behavior inside, reportedly crying, elbowing, grabbing, pouncing, pushing, screaming, shoving, and yelling to get the clothes. In Sweden, women forcibly stripped the mannequins. In New York, one shopper was spotted assaulting an out-of-reach sweater display with an "empty metal rod."
I braved the early-morning line at an H&M in SoHo, hoping to score a few items and examine the clothes firsthand. The women I waited with were not quite the feral hellcats described in the papers, but they were high-performance shoppers—like professional athletes with credit cards—and they regarded each other with a cordial, appraising cool.
Several had trained for the event by scrutinizing photos of the collection available on H&M's Web site. They cased the store's layout through its plate glass windows, no doubt visualizing successful retail maneuvers. In line, they traded tidbits: "I heard the whole collection isn't being sold in the U.S.—some items are only being shipped to stores in Europe." (A McCartney rep later confirmed this.) There were also adrenaline-boosting declarations of intent: "I'm damned if I'm leaving here without a pair of those jeans." The doors opened at 10 a.m.; by 10:13, the racks were empty, apart from a few forlorn bikinis that lay scattered like chaff on the floor.
Marketers have a term for the shopping experience H&M created: massclusivity. The idea is to offer a limited run of a premium item. The upside: Shoppers who are savvy enough to snag what you're selling feel like part of a members-only club. (I saw women at H&M buying clothes without trying them on—they just wanted to own a piece of the Stella McCartney collection.) And for the retailer, there's virtually no downside: Shoppers who show up after the exclusive goods are gone might stick around and buy something else. H&M marketing director Jorgen Andersson told Fortune that the company's collaboration with McCartney was "the ultimate in massclusivity," adding, "if we had these designs in the stores for a month, people would get bored."
In other words, what makes these clothes desirable is not their inherent quality, but the demand manufactured by the company. Indeed, upon close examination, McCartney's collection doesn't warrant all the fuss. The clothes are nicer than many of H&M's wares: The fabrics are better—the blue wrap dress pictured here, for example, is made of a rich, sueded silk—and a number of pieces feature fine detail work, like the tiny pleats along the neckline here. But the clothes often seem poorly thought out. Consider, for example, the metal balls dangling from the cuffs of the dress, which retailed for $69.90. The baubles must have seemed a nice ornamental touch in the initial sketches, but in reality, they have the heft of shooter marbles. On the dancefloor, your arm could easily become as fearsome a weapon as the double-ball flail.
The collection is full of similar missteps. A pretty rhinestone-studded camisole ($59.90) has an unusual flared silhouette, but the stones are unevenly spaced, and the ribbon at its neckline looks likely to fray. An oversized sweater with a striking deep V-neck ($59.90) uses a soft blend of wool and silk, but the fabric is already beginning to pill. And while McCartney is known for tailored pieces, it's particularly tough to make an inexpensive, good-looking blazer: A jacket with sharp tuxedo styling ($99.90) is made of thin wool that has a chintzy sheen.
In the end, though, quality may be immaterial. What H&M is selling, even more than designer clothes, is a designer experience. Typically, limited-edition goods are designer goods, and because of the time and expense it takes to acquire them, they're available only to the rich and well-connected. But with the McCartney and Lagerfeld collections, H&M has made such items available to anyone willing to rearrange her schedule. Get up early, throw a few elbows, and you, too, can own a rare designer piece. If Target and Michael Graves were advocating the democratization of good design, H&M seems to be promoting something stranger and more elusive—the democratization of designer shopping itself.
Even so, it's the shoppers who get short shrift. Last year, they found an unlikely champion in Karl Lagerfeld, who told a German magazine he was surprised his line sold out so fast: "They did not make the clothes in sufficient quantities," he said. "I find it embarrassing that H&M let down so many people ... . It is snobbery created by anti-snobbery." About that, he's absolutely right.
http://www.slate.com/id/2130603/?nav=tap3
Selling Out
Why you can't buy H&M's Stella McCartney collection.
By Julia Turner
Posted Monday, Nov. 21, 2005, at 8:49 PM ET
When elite designers first linked arms with mass-market retail chains, the driving impulse was populist. The architect Michael Graves helped kick off the trend in 1999 when he signed up to create housewares for Target; his idea was to make well-designed products available to people of modest means. Subsequent collaborations—between Target and Philippe Starck, Cynthia Rowley, and Isaac Mizrahi; between JCPenney and Nicole Miller; between H&M and Karl Lagerfeld—have also been framed in rhetoric that conveys a sense of aesthetic noblesse oblige.
H&M's most recent collaboration, with Stella McCartney, seemed to be no exception. In a presale press release, McCartney said she wanted to offer "a wider female audience" a line that is "attractively priced yet offers high quality together with a superb fit and details." But when McCartney's collection debuted earlier this month, it sold out within hours. So, in truth, the defining characteristic of McCartney's clothes for H&M is not that they're cheap, or even that they're well-designed. It's that you can't have them. Those skinny jeans that retailed for $69.90? They're about as hard to acquire as an Hermès Birkin bag.
H&M intended the line to sell out quickly. While Graves' first collection for Target featured more than 150 styles, McCartney's collection for H&M included about 40. And while Mizrahi has produced several lines for Target, the McCartney collection was a one-off: H&M made no plans to restock its stores after the initial run sold out. The strategy had already proven successful: Last year, bargain-hunting style hounds devoured a limited edition collection from Karl Lagerfeld the morning it hit the floor, and the fashion press had a ball covering the fracas. H&M was clearly looking to re-create that frenzy.
The plan worked. When McCartney's clothes debuted earlier this month at stores in the United States and Europe, bemused accounts appeared in papers across the globe. The Daily Mail's piece was headlined "Stellamania!" (in a nod to her famous dad); the New York Post ran with "H&M Hordes 'Rack' Havoc With War Cry: 'Back Off My Dress, b*tch!' " Most pieces noted that shoppers arrived impressively early, stood in impressively long lines and indulged in nasty behavior inside, reportedly crying, elbowing, grabbing, pouncing, pushing, screaming, shoving, and yelling to get the clothes. In Sweden, women forcibly stripped the mannequins. In New York, one shopper was spotted assaulting an out-of-reach sweater display with an "empty metal rod."
I braved the early-morning line at an H&M in SoHo, hoping to score a few items and examine the clothes firsthand. The women I waited with were not quite the feral hellcats described in the papers, but they were high-performance shoppers—like professional athletes with credit cards—and they regarded each other with a cordial, appraising cool.
Several had trained for the event by scrutinizing photos of the collection available on H&M's Web site. They cased the store's layout through its plate glass windows, no doubt visualizing successful retail maneuvers. In line, they traded tidbits: "I heard the whole collection isn't being sold in the U.S.—some items are only being shipped to stores in Europe." (A McCartney rep later confirmed this.) There were also adrenaline-boosting declarations of intent: "I'm damned if I'm leaving here without a pair of those jeans." The doors opened at 10 a.m.; by 10:13, the racks were empty, apart from a few forlorn bikinis that lay scattered like chaff on the floor.
Marketers have a term for the shopping experience H&M created: massclusivity. The idea is to offer a limited run of a premium item. The upside: Shoppers who are savvy enough to snag what you're selling feel like part of a members-only club. (I saw women at H&M buying clothes without trying them on—they just wanted to own a piece of the Stella McCartney collection.) And for the retailer, there's virtually no downside: Shoppers who show up after the exclusive goods are gone might stick around and buy something else. H&M marketing director Jorgen Andersson told Fortune that the company's collaboration with McCartney was "the ultimate in massclusivity," adding, "if we had these designs in the stores for a month, people would get bored."
In other words, what makes these clothes desirable is not their inherent quality, but the demand manufactured by the company. Indeed, upon close examination, McCartney's collection doesn't warrant all the fuss. The clothes are nicer than many of H&M's wares: The fabrics are better—the blue wrap dress pictured here, for example, is made of a rich, sueded silk—and a number of pieces feature fine detail work, like the tiny pleats along the neckline here. But the clothes often seem poorly thought out. Consider, for example, the metal balls dangling from the cuffs of the dress, which retailed for $69.90. The baubles must have seemed a nice ornamental touch in the initial sketches, but in reality, they have the heft of shooter marbles. On the dancefloor, your arm could easily become as fearsome a weapon as the double-ball flail.
The collection is full of similar missteps. A pretty rhinestone-studded camisole ($59.90) has an unusual flared silhouette, but the stones are unevenly spaced, and the ribbon at its neckline looks likely to fray. An oversized sweater with a striking deep V-neck ($59.90) uses a soft blend of wool and silk, but the fabric is already beginning to pill. And while McCartney is known for tailored pieces, it's particularly tough to make an inexpensive, good-looking blazer: A jacket with sharp tuxedo styling ($99.90) is made of thin wool that has a chintzy sheen.
In the end, though, quality may be immaterial. What H&M is selling, even more than designer clothes, is a designer experience. Typically, limited-edition goods are designer goods, and because of the time and expense it takes to acquire them, they're available only to the rich and well-connected. But with the McCartney and Lagerfeld collections, H&M has made such items available to anyone willing to rearrange her schedule. Get up early, throw a few elbows, and you, too, can own a rare designer piece. If Target and Michael Graves were advocating the democratization of good design, H&M seems to be promoting something stranger and more elusive—the democratization of designer shopping itself.
Even so, it's the shoppers who get short shrift. Last year, they found an unlikely champion in Karl Lagerfeld, who told a German magazine he was surprised his line sold out so fast: "They did not make the clothes in sufficient quantities," he said. "I find it embarrassing that H&M let down so many people ... . It is snobbery created by anti-snobbery." About that, he's absolutely right.
liberty33r1b
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2003
- Messages
- 24,305
- Reaction score
- 691
very interesting article!
and i learned a new word: massclusivity - so perfect!
and i learned a new word: massclusivity - so perfect!
PrincessImp.
Of too many minds
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2004
- Messages
- 6,682
- Reaction score
- 0
^ thanks for the article, lucy!
MASSCLUSIVITY indeed!
Anyone knows if there are any Stella pieces left in the SF H&M stores??
MASSCLUSIVITY indeed!
Anyone knows if there are any Stella pieces left in the SF H&M stores??
seasecrets
Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2005
- Messages
- 394
- Reaction score
- 0
^ i remember going on the day they opened and all they had left was some stella t-shirts, a few dressy tops and not much else. i doubt there's anything left by now.
PrincessImp.
Of too many minds
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2004
- Messages
- 6,682
- Reaction score
- 0
^Thanks for the info...I guess that's to be expected. 
Sigh.
Sigh.
QuirkyCool
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2005
- Messages
- 1,831
- Reaction score
- 0
Well I went to H&M the day after the Stella things went on sale,and most of it was sold out.There was only one of the black silk dresses left,and it wasn't my size. I was sorry because it looked like a lovely dress.
Anyway I happen by there again today,and they've completely sold out except for the black silk dress,which is now hanging there in every size from 34 to 44.Obviously all returned,and upon trying it on it became apparent why...
They fall so very strangely,and the zipper on the side pulls the fabric in a very funny way.It was a great idea,dreadfully executed!!
They also have the full range of jumpsuits there now,so obviously a lot of people were similarly disillusioned.Therese looks wonderful in her jumpsuit,but they're not for everyone.
Anyway at least i no longer have to be sorry that I didn't rush in there fighting on the first day
.
Anyway I happen by there again today,and they've completely sold out except for the black silk dress,which is now hanging there in every size from 34 to 44.Obviously all returned,and upon trying it on it became apparent why...
They fall so very strangely,and the zipper on the side pulls the fabric in a very funny way.It was a great idea,dreadfully executed!!
They also have the full range of jumpsuits there now,so obviously a lot of people were similarly disillusioned.Therese looks wonderful in her jumpsuit,but they're not for everyone.
Anyway at least i no longer have to be sorry that I didn't rush in there fighting on the first day
.I received my Stella clothes yesterday, that I had ordered online from swedish HM Rowells. I got the blue wrap-dress, The blue longsleeved top with patterns and the black wide pants. I'm so happy
I really wanted the denim jeans and the sweater with the silk ribbons though, but they were sold out...But right now I'm just pretty pleased with owning anything at all.
They're launching some new stuff online tonight, and I'll try to get my hands on some more stuff!
I really wanted the denim jeans and the sweater with the silk ribbons though, but they were sold out...But right now I'm just pretty pleased with owning anything at all.
They're launching some new stuff online tonight, and I'll try to get my hands on some more stuff!
^I'll answer for you on this one as well. I'm european 34 in jeans and got the shorts in 36 'cause that was the smallest size left-- it fits good, kind of loose but not so loose that it's looks too big. I think having them in a smaller size and really tapered would make it more vulgar looking, now it's just beautiful.. so i'd say a size bigger than usual (it's not as big as the tops/coats which looked so much bigger than their size, the shorts does correspond to normal sizes..)
vintage_princess
Adorable illusion
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2004
- Messages
- 6,608
- Reaction score
- 0
I love those shorts! I really liked them when I first saw a scan. Its a shame they didnt seem to be available when I had a look when Stella stuff first came out. You look fantastic!! 
Last edited by a moderator:
