Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Magazines' started by honeycombchild, Apr 1, 2019.
The first one is nice. The second one useless. The third one way too VP.
Nice covers. I love the first two. (and I'm not even a kate moss fan)
I love the idea of the first cover, but as usual, the overall design doesn't work as well as it should - the words are getting lost against the image.
As for the other two shots, they are far worse than any of the Kate Moss covers from the "old Vogue" era. You'd think for her 40th cover, we'd see something more inspired than this.
Jesus, the photoshop on Mikael's cover! Garish stuff.
Jamie's cover shouldn't been enough. It's beautiful and fresh.
A very hard pass on these Moss covers. Edward, you were doing so well!
The Hawkesworth cover is the best. Should have stopped right there.
The MJ cover should immediately be flushed and forgotten.
The IV cover is garish.
They are all equally hideous... by far the worst offering from Edward...
these are SO bad. all of them look somewhat unfinished and almost like some provincial edition's reprints. the typography is so off, too. you see far better work in the tfs magazine cover challenge thread, it's shocking someone gets paid for this "art" direction.
This had all the elements of a stellar cover.
JH cover - the body ate too much space. It could’ve worked if it weren’t too zoomed in. Even the mood is lovely.
MJ cover - the pose and the styling works, but the face looks too blurred and feels like it was added on the photo
IV cover - feels too editorial. Maybe it should’ve been zoomed a little? And she looks like she’s wearing something cheap.
Although, the art direction is in the right direction.
The taglines leave me cold.
And I’m seeing no Karl tribute
I swear to God, when I saw the I&V ones I thought that was a throwback cover. I feel like I’ve seen that cover before LOL
I actually quite like all the covers! Some I like less but none do I hate and that’s actually positive.
Jamie’s cover is probably my favorite one. The cropping is really weird but I like the overall appeal of the cover. Looks peaceful.
Ashamed to say this because of the amount of photoshop but Mikael’s cover is also nice! Would’ve been my favorite but because of the photoshop, I just can’t
I&V cover is the most boring cover I have seen in a while! Looks like it was produced under Alexandra’s editorship and I definitely did not like her covers or her style, so not good at all.
All I’m wondering is which cover will subscribers get?
These covers are absolutely MAJ! I wondering when he was going to give MRS. BRITISH VOGUE her cover!
I really want the IV cover, but I’m going to try in get all three when they come to the US.
The way the first cover the cropped is just jarringly off to me, I can't get past it. Which is a shame, because it could be really lovely if the size and positioning of Kate were adjusted relative to the cover layout.
The first one looks like a cheap 70s porn magazine for men. All of them are too horrible... the composition is unbalanced, the lighting is weird. The I&V shoot looks like Vogue Paris on their train-wreck...
The first one is fabulous, the second is terrible and the third indeed looks like a VP cover.
It slightly reminds me of her March 2004 VP cover.
I feel like I haven’t seen her on the cover of Vogue recently so I don’t mind but Edward needs to work on the Art Direction of his covers!
I&V one looks just like her VP cover in 2009. I like though.
Never understood her appeal and none of these covers are doing anything to change my mind.
''It's too this, it's too that...'', whatever. I L O V E it and I can't wait to buy it and appreciate it forever, you can never go wrong with Kate even though it would've been even more glorious if Edward convinced Meisel to shoot her next month.
Sometimes I think people keep using Kate because she's been around forever, not because she's doing anything worthwhile. Because these covers aren't worth it.
The first is 'ok', the other two are grotesque.