US Vogue February 2009 : Blake Lively by Mario Testino | Page 4 | the Fashion Spot

US Vogue February 2009 : Blake Lively by Mario Testino

Well that is my opinion, i think its uneccessary , and dont share the sentiment that this is somehow more photoshoped than some other V covers we have seen.(drew's was heavily photoshoped, as were many from last year.)

yes, exactly!
there's no point on making comparisons to how she looks in real to how she looks in that pic.
 
honestly at first glance i would say that is an actres 40-year-old, a bad copy of the divine cate blanchett

the ethereal beauty that is Cate wouldn't need photoshopping,

nor would she require publicity to make it seem like she can act. :innocent:

ok, i've said my bit on the matter. I don't even read US Vogue in all it's mediocrity so i'll peace out now. :lol::flower:
 
At least this dress actually fits her, so it's already a step up from the W Cover.

Although, she looks like January Jones here (which would have been a much better choice imo).

I was going to say the same thing, it looks like they were inspired by January Jones. Hopefully she has a Vogue cover in her future...anyway this is a good cover for Blake, an improvement over that hideous W one.
 
Good for Vogue! I am not a fan of Blake, but I wasn't a fan of 90% of the "old guard" either (Renee, Keira, SJP). I always complain about Vogue using the same five actresses year after year so, whether I like the new faces or not, I'm just glad that Vogue isn't starting 2009 with stagnant faces.

Although, I have to ask, is Blake really so undeserving of a cover (as some people here seem to think)? I have questioned at least 60% of Vogue's cover choices in the past and, to me, Blake feels like an appropriate choice. Oh well.

Anyway, ignoring the "who" for a moment, I have to say this cover is stunning! The dress, the hair, the makeup, the background... it's all perfect. After all that atrocious hair (Keira, Gwyneth), and those boring backgrounds (Kate B., Reese), this is a treat!
 
That's a pretty cover, if the contents are any good I may pick up Vogue US for the first time since the last Kate Moss cover!
 
the cover is alright. I'll look past too much photoshop, but Blake Lively...seriously:blink: I've accepted the fact that Anna will only put an actress on the cover, but Blake?! what has she done to deserve it? next month maybe we can have one of the girls from 90210
 
Although, I have to ask, is Blake really so undeserving of a cover (as some people here seem to think)?

^ check her imdb page, check out the projects she has done (very few), the roles she's been in (extremely lightweight, low brow fare).

finally, force yourself to watch her attempt to act on gossip girl (where her ubiquitous fame comes from). :doh:

then you'll get it.
 
NOOOO.

Blake Lively is a TERRIBLE actress. I scroll past all the Serena scenes in Gossip Girl lest my eyes glaze over. I don't understand why she's getting ALL the press when Leighton Meester is much more deserving.

Does she have a better publicist?

I dislike SERENA VAN DER WOODSEN. Blake Lively can't act at all and I swear that she recycles 3 expressions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I understand that Conde has decided that she is the girl that they are going to mold and make in their image. She looks lovely, but I just don't understand why. In a world of Amanda Seyfried and Amy Adams and other great actresses, why Blake?

her show isn't even successful, critically or commercially
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HELLO. i am a crazy banana, i think.

Are we going to talk about the contents or..?
 
^^But the issue isnt out yet, or is it?Thought just the cover was leaked. :unsure:
 
sadly, like the Brad Pitt cover..

the cover and cover discussion dominates over the actual contents.

that's what happens when celebrities get covers :innocent:

Whoo! American magazine industry! :clap:

NOT. :ninja:
 
At least this dress actually fits her, so it's already a step up from the W Cover.

Although, she looks like January Jones here (which would have been a much better choice imo).

you never know, vogue us is made about mad men (har har) and with the show going the way it is she's getting heaps of publicity. and since anne was on january's cover, who knows who we'll get in the coming months. i'm hoping for some more deserving and talented actresses, like amy adams, january and even kate winslet, since hoping for models seems a little pointless.

blake does look good though, and i like the pose on the cover. much, much, much better than i thought it would be, all things considered.
 
I'm also imagining just how this cover would be described on the show.

Gossip Girl here,

Attention Upper East siders, which reformed bad girl back from the brink has just joined the fashion status quo? Its seems our favorite poor little rich girl has usurped Queen Bee and grabbed the attention of the infamous Prada clad devil. What does this spell for the future - and for the reformed friendship of two very well heeled it girls? Only time and Lil' J will tell.

You know you love me.

xoxo

Gossip Girl

I'm having too much fun with this.


oooo i love this! this statement is exactly what gossip girl would release.

I also question if Blake really deserves this cover. However US Vogue doing something good is so rare that I won't complain. She's a new face for Vogue US, therefore I'm happy. It's as though Vogue is taking baby steps towards excellence, and leaving mediocrity behind.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,211
Messages
15,291,416
Members
89,145
Latest member
junebiebero
Back
Top