helmut.newton
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2008
- Messages
- 4,708
- Reaction score
- 6
At this point, putting an 'actress' [and I use this term very loosely here] like Blake Lively on the cover of Vogue is frankly embarrassing.
I thought that ditching models on the cover was so that Vogue could give 'regular' women who have made some kind of achievement in their lives, a chance to grace the cover. What exactly has Blake Lively 'achieved' other than the status of a popular-culture icon? Surely, it can't be for her roles or her fashion sense.
If Blake Lively got a US Vogue cover, then why didn't Mischa Barton? At least Barton had appeared in some decent films and was to some extent a fashion 'icon'.
Besides; Gossip Girl is the worlds most stupid show. Why would Vogue choose to be associated with something so unintelligent?
I thought that ditching models on the cover was so that Vogue could give 'regular' women who have made some kind of achievement in their lives, a chance to grace the cover. What exactly has Blake Lively 'achieved' other than the status of a popular-culture icon? Surely, it can't be for her roles or her fashion sense.
If Blake Lively got a US Vogue cover, then why didn't Mischa Barton? At least Barton had appeared in some decent films and was to some extent a fashion 'icon'.
Besides; Gossip Girl is the worlds most stupid show. Why would Vogue choose to be associated with something so unintelligent?