^
While I do get where you are coming from, there are couple of things to address:
1. "Your tone seems very pointed right now". It is quite strange to reflect on other's racist undertones without much back up to the claim and starting your side of the talk with the words "so disgusting".
2. Her poems are sure what got her the cover and her appearance at the inauguration, but this isn't a poetry forum, this is a fashion forum and we discuss sexy/unsexy hair, childish headbands and other aspects of fashion. I have no idea why it is an issue on a fashion forum not to discuss someone's poems, we did not discuss Justin's music when he was on the cover and nor did we discuss Naomi Osaka's tournaments, so why would this case be different?
3. The vast majority of financially eligible population uses social media and particularly Instagram. A lot of fashion houses make the majority of their profit from entry-level products and accessories that people get to show off on social media, and get those likes. I'd say likes aren't essential, but a pretty great metric to measure the relevance.
4. Saying that hair isn't sexy or the headband is childish is racist how? I am sorry, if she is a person of colour, now we are obligated to love everything about this cover and swoon over it? Racism is sure a problem in the contemporary world, but please let's remain sober and separate being logically concerned and being overly sensitive to critical statements.