BaroqueRockstar
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2005
- Messages
- 4,073
- Reaction score
- 1
um...
<<speechless>>
WHY???????
<<speechless>>
WHY???????
BerlinRocks said:omg the magazine is not even printed yet. and already 7pages!!!
this is just Paris Hilton doing a cover. yeah yeah Vogue is a bible and when I'm reading your post it's like Paris HIlton has no right to have an entrance in Bible....
well she's doing the cover. in a minimalist way. she's wearing Balenciaga (?) and looks beautiful and def. not vulgar.
Vogue is there to represent modern lifestyle etc., to makes us dream, to makes everything glamourous etc.
Paris Hilton is a f***ing socialite and has a great "impact" on teens...
Why a socialite wouldn't have the right to do a Vogue cover?! such girls used to do that back in the early XXth.
WhiteLinen said:I always thought Vogue Paris was a magazine for women, not teenage girls. So if Paris does have an impact on some poor teenagers, then why should that be a reason for her to be in the cover of Vogue? Do fashionable French women admire and look up to her?
Dieselmax said:Well, she said that Paris Hilton was controversial, and that Vogue Paris loves controversy and that she wanted to "glamourize" hilton's sulfurous image.And that everything she touches turns to gold, yeah haha.
Lena said:i know Vogue Paris is desperate for grabbing a piece of the high circulation cake but promoting PH with hopes that they'll sell more issues is more than pathetic..
Carine R. should take a bit more 'pride' to her covers, sorry but the 'controversial' excuse wont do, cause Paris is not 'controversial' she's a laughing stock issue
iluvjeisa said:At this point I'm wishing they could have put on a Balenciaga hat on her head to complete the picture...