Chloé F/W 09.10 Paris

00280m.jpg
00270m.jpg

00250m.jpg
00260m.jpg

00290m.jpg
00300m.jpg

00310m.jpg
00340m.jpg


style.com
 
00010f.jpg
00010m.jpg


Chloe Fall 2004 and Chloe Fall 2009/10

These are the first faces of both collections. So similar in silhouette and colour. I love it though!

Style.com
 
well the detailing is nice on lots of the outfits , i still hate the pants except for the mustard ones paired with those musketeer style boots (VERY 1981-82) , well Chloe became a blockbuster of Phoebe's spins of 70s and early 80s fashions , Chloes hall mark is its dirty pretty look , it cant send out a cyber goth or punk colleciton because the house isnt about that . Im sure these clothes in parts will fare much better than Paulos stuff did , I would like for her to experiment with different trousers and not to see woolen hammer pants for spring, because one of Chloes trump cards are its great pants , I didnt see many on this runway . SHe is no frida , there is emotion and thought in this collection.
 
disco54 said:
well Chloe became a blockbuster of Phoebe's spins of 70s and early 80s fashions , Chloes hall mark is its dirty pretty look , it cant send out a cyber goth or punk colleciton because the house isnt about that .


True. :smile:

To be fair, there have been elements of punk, which I think were very successful - for example, I have a studded Ida clutch bag from S/S '06.

But it is not a hard-edged punk, it is softened and vintage-looking (BS vintage, as one TFS member so eloquently put it! :lol: ). :D

More like what punk evolved into, in the early '80s.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,572
Messages
15,189,544
Members
86,467
Latest member
XYT
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->