Personally I think its stupid to pay $200 bucks for a pair of "damaged" jeans when I can get two pairs of good jeans and over time let it become naturally damaged. Or if I want naturally ripped jeans I'll go to a thrift store and spend two bucks.
I used to think that way too, before I became stupid.Originally posted by Toxiiic@Jun 24th, 2004 - 1:00 pm
Personally I think its stupid to pay $200 bucks for a pair of "damaged" jeans when I can get two pairs of good jeans and over time let it become naturally damaged. Or if I want naturally ripped jeans I'll go to a thrift store and spend two bucks.
those jeans looks like bullet holes [/b][/quote]Originally posted by *DrAma*+Jun 23rd, 2004 - 11:29 pm--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (*DrAma* @ Jun 23rd, 2004 - 11:29 pm)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Caroline@Jun 23rd, 2004 - 10:05 pm
This is what I mean
$178Battered, tattered and torn to perfection. Diagonally seamed flared legs and a dirty wash complete the shabby-chic look you'll love to wear.
Originally posted by Toxxxic@Jun 24 2004, 03:00 PM
Personally I think its stupid to pay $200 bucks for a pair of "damaged" jeans when I can get two pairs of good jeans and over time let it become naturally damaged. Or if I want naturally ripped jeans I'll go to a thrift store and spend two bucks.
[snapback]295892[/snapback]
Originally posted by stylegurrl@Aug 9 2004, 02:13 PM
I personally will not wear any jeans that are whiskered, torn, faded etc. When my jeans start to look like that I throw them out and buy a new pair. I can't understand the concept of paying $100+ for jeans that look old and worn.
[snapback]326149[/snapback]
Originally posted by mikeijames@Aug 11 2004, 12:30 PM
that's why for you they make $100+ jeans that look brand spanking new
[snapback]328390[/snapback]