Im suprised in a place called the fashion spot there are so many narrow minded reviews, if you don't like progressive fashion there is always D&G, knowone is saying this is the difinitive collection...
I think we have got to a point where gender divides are often just what sex you are. Many people dress very androgenously, with trousers and shirts etc. Even wider culturally males and females are doing the same jobs for the same money. Is this not what the non-radical feminists wanted? I am fed up of having to conform to traditional masculine roles and I think this is a reflection of that. Although I have no real idea my insight is that she is realising this thin divide and having fun with it. Is this not what the essence of fashion is? I don't think it is a huge leap to go from Dior Homme (as an example) that I am sure most people absolutely adorded because is was progressive but in a traditionally masculine way. There is a point where detail comes to play a huge part in the identity of the collection, whether it be tighter fitting, smaller collars, playing with zip placement. Aside from the tutu's I don't think much of it is drastically different to something you may find in a 'traditional' collection, the details have made it so.
Having said all of this perhaps it is 'wierd for the sake of wierd' but I like it so far...I hope a video turns up soon...