US Vogue September 2019 : Taylor Swift by Inez van Lamsweerde & Vinoodh Matadin

Taylor's pastel and rainbows phase *could* have been taken to fun, haute couture extremes and they'd have delivered the fashion while satisfying her fan base.

Agreed 100%. This could have been such a colorful, airy, fun shot that reflects her album's mood and her current phrase, while still being fashion. Hell, she could have just worn a dress from her Me video, and it could have worked.

The shot in post #85 is lovely though. That would have been a great cover,
 
I don't have time for Louis Vuitton on the best of days, but I'm perplexed that Vogue chose this look for their cover. Is it flannel or sweatpants material? Can't get behind it, sorry. It's very hard to make it look chic.

I mean, some of guys are really into it!

It’s silly to compare US Vogue to UK Vogue or any other Vogue because the scales or impact are not the same. The reality is that we are in a very short-lived period in terms of information.

People don’t consume magazines the same way they consumed a decade ago and to be honest, people are also confused about what is right to do and what should be done.

Anna’s biggest quality is her biggest flaw: she is a business woman. And the problem with that each issue reflect a business move. And it’s harder to hide it at a time when the entire American fashion industry is struggling.
Generally in those times, it pays in a long term to take risks and try something new but the business mind always wants to play it safe because there’s a fear of losing sales...

But don’t be twisted, US Vogue is still a magazine that counts. It is still the most important culturally. The magazine is not dead because Anna was clever at creating other buzz worthy things around the magazine that actually other editions of Vogue or any other magazine don’t have.

Edward, Emmanuelle or Farneti can only deliver good or bad issues but after the issue is released, there’s nothing. The content of VP on YouTube for example is appalling!

And being of Vogue is still important. People wants to be on UK Vogue because it’s the hottest Vogue in town and because it’s the new platform for this new narrative of progressivism that celebrities are into. But, US Vogue and Anna can give access to the world of High Fashion to people. The « i’m Co-signed » by Anna still means something and is still the biggest co-sign in the industry, TRUST ME.

Look at Taylor previous cover... Suddenly, she was buddy buddy with Nicolas Ghesquiere and wore exclusive Vuitton. It served her narrative even if in reality, nobody cares about her in the fashion industry.

I personally believe that it’s the time for Vogue to go back to models and to have more control on their narrative. I think that social media has prepared models for celebrity culture and the rest. And Vogue can recreate a phenomenon around models and control their narrative again.

You're bringing up so many valid points, Lola!! And I think the most important bit is that American print, in general, is on its last legs and if you must pit her against someone, it should be an American editor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MON
She's wearing Gucci on the other cover.
 
Just saw the issue in real life...



It actually looks okay???

And it does stand out in the newsstands. It calls your attention because the shot in itself is unconventional.
 
You're bringing up so many valid points, Lola!! And I think the most important bit is that American print, in general, is on its last legs and if you must pit her against someone, it should be an American editor.
Yes, exactly. And to be honest, the only competition Anna has at the moment in America is Nina Garcia because she is taking her magazine to the US Vogue kind of road and using herself, much like Anna, as a cultural tool to have an influence on Culture. In the 90´s, it was US Bazaar because it was the chicest magazine ever. In the 00’s imo, it was W.

But today, at the time when everybody is struggling, W & HB are on life support. Look at what HB did by bringing Carine. She is just there basically to give a kind of cultural relevance to the magazine. She add a cachet just by her presence, while delivering lazy work.

Edward won the « September challenge » or whatever just because he had the dutchess involved but the reality is that it’s not going to have an impact because she’s not on a cover. And the conversation it creates and the subjects touched on the issue are not groundbreaking because it’s just on the wave of the narrative of the entire entertainment industry.
It’s a bit like what Alexandra did Kate. Ok it was a cute cover...But it was boring. And i can’t even remember what she talked about in the issue...
 
Just saw the issue in real life...



It actually looks okay???

And it does stand out in the newsstands. It calls your attention because the shot in itself is unconventional.
How many pages?
 
Did they use up all their budget trying to get Taylor?
 
Crikey! A decrease for sure, but probably Vogue China will be the only one able to top this. Unless they've pulled the Versace ads.
Maybe Vogue India, since the August issue has more then 400 pages
 
I got a weird question but im curious, anyone got a photo of the advertisement on the opposite cover? I think its called counter cover, i dont remember.
 
Stacey Abrams by Ethan James Green
Hair, Edward Lampley; makeup, Fara Homidi.
Sittings Editor: Carlos Nazario
F895E4FF-2DD4-4E34-B684-242FC81C5DA8.jpeg
Vogue
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,174
Messages
15,213,074
Members
87,121
Latest member
thekimmika
Back
Top