Well because that's not how it works. all those people would have to be let go and you would have to start all over again with no popularity and no history or funding behind their name it rarely works in that way. Branding and sticking to a brand identity is very important but with McQueen it is very difficult he was a dark individual with a heavy pass so dark (and I love him) but I never want to see anybody like that ever again. So you have to build on the codes that he left behind But it will take time. The greatest to ever do this was Karl lagerfield but what karl did was just an illusion, Coco would have probably hated him. I say let's give him two or three more seasons. Anyways this young designer will be fired as so many designers have been fired. His best bet is to simply have fun the same way McQueen had fun givenchy enjoy the experiences used to work houses gain knowledge. That's simply all that can be done. But as McQueen said his self this house should have been closed down. But no one would ever be perfect for this house it's too difficult.
It is very soulless, it's like they set him down and said we want this that and this. Giles Deacon is the only designer I can think of that would work well in this house.
I don't want to clean the floor and drag Olivier Theyskens's name out once again lamo
He would be very good for McQueen he has that nice deep and dark romantic fantasy quality I don't know how that translates into sells and visibility
That was my exact thought. It's like a high quality diffusion line, but a diffusion line nonetheless. It’s just barely ambitious enough to differentiate it from basic. While I’d like to blame him entirely, working for Kering must be a nightmare for creativity.
Riccardo is going to Chanel
since when???
