Not Plain Jane
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2010
- Messages
- 15,422
- Reaction score
- 719
There is an important distinction that's missed here.I think overall it's much better he just needs to tap in a little more. The fashion industry is the only industry in the world a person is asked to design like another person no one asks a person to paint like Pablo Picasso no one asks a person to sing like Whitney Houston it's virtually impossible but in the fashion world it is asked of. This is a much better collection I can see things better on the store racks we can see shirts pants and cool jackets they need to Target a younger customer which is what they're trying to do. Obviously though they've lost a lot of customers that high-end customers who wants impeccable tailored suits they have to lure her in also the fun girl that wants a cool type nasty dress.
He's trying his best covering all the basics of McQueen adding a little theatrics I think the show set was much better he just needs to tap in a little bit more. I'm rooting for him only because he's interested and well there are very few people that can do that job. Right now after this show you need just to focus on sales advertisement and marketing it's a lot of work and it can be daunting.
The difference is that this designer is designing under another person's name, "brand" and legacy.
It is completely different than if, say, a NEW singer came along with her own name and style; why would anyone expect her to be at all like whitney houston?
in this case, by contrast, the expectations are precisely because the NAME on this thread is McQueen, so of course most fans, followers, or consumers will look for some semblance of who and what he stood for in his designs - the philosophy, even the ineffable elements - also in the fashion house he created.
Otherwise, why not take this new designer and start a completely NEW label or fashion house with no ties or expectations? Maybe some fashion houses SHOULD "die" when their creators do -- no?