isa.b.elle.
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2009
- Messages
- 3,516
- Reaction score
- 4
from the preview it sound like an amazing issue!!!must have for sure 



I'll just repeat it again, it looks STUNNING! Very iconic, indeed. Though I'm kind of like irritated with her breasts. 
What caught my attention in the cover photo is the mask that she's wearing.

Rose Cordero's March 2010 cover is still the Vogue paris cover of the year, for me. +1 for Black models on the cover of Vogue.And based on aesthetics alone, it's still by far a better image.

Alright guys, you have already mentioned the right words that would best describe the cover.I'll just repeat it again, it looks STUNNING! Very iconic, indeed. Though I'm kind of like irritated with her breasts.
What caught my attention in the cover photo is the mask that she's wearing.
![]()
Why they didn't work with Steven Meisel? I mean, this is an anniversary issue and it'll be big that's why I think the master photographer should have at least shot something for this issue. Just a thought.
On the other hand, I am so excited for this one! So many great photographers!![]()


We have seen her boobs multipe times. But the people less aware of her or her other work, don't. And on her way out? She is still getting the better jobs than everybody else. She is just getting more exclusive. She isn't doing anything or everything anymore.I like the cover, I think it's striking. But that's about it.
I think it would have been even more interesting if we haven't seen Lara and her boobs countless times. It's one more shoot of Lara and her boobs, not The shoot that will change perceptions. There is something dated about it, bit of downer, Lara to me is clearly on the way out, this cover would have worked much better when the catwalk and editorials were only populated with Waifs. Only then would make sense calling it iconic, etc...etc...

