Vogue Paris September 2010 : Marion Cotillard by Mert Alas & Marcus Piggott | Page 14 | the Fashion Spot

Vogue Paris September 2010 : Marion Cotillard by Mert Alas & Marcus Piggott

I can't seem to think of the perfect or right term to describe Natasha's editorial. Perhaps hilarious? :lol::D But she and Jamie make a good couple, huh? ;)
 
I don't care for Natasha's editorial at all. It looks so amateurish. Although, it's not really her (or Jamie for that matter, who just looks as good as usual) it's more about the bad styling, the bad photography and just... the whole look of it.

Oh well. I do still like the cover. I like what they did with her.
 
Corps D'Elite (Natasha Poly and Jamie Dornan by Terry Richardson) is a decent ed (three boob flashes are a bit much but that comes with the territory when it comes to French Vogue and Terry Richardson). The best thing about the ed is the humor which is refreshing but sadly Natasha is the weak link here, she does not ruin the ed but she does she elevate it either. Someone mentioned her cold professionalism and that is an apt description. I have seen candids of Natasha and she seems to have a personality and a sense of humor and she is anything but cold on the runway, when called for, she just needs to incorporate some of that passion in her print work.
 
I don't think I like how to the side the cover is, and maybe the colors, but Marion's ed is great. I think the other M&M is better, that Daphne girl really caught my eye :heart:
In a way I kind of agree with adorefaith on Natasha, I'm just not as impressed with her like I was :ninja:
Does Malgosia's beauty ed have 1 pic? That's all I see in her thread and this thread :unsure:
 
It actually lets me down that Marion landed the cover of the September issue, I would have loved Vogue Paris to dedicate her that of December. I was dumbfounded when I saw her editorial, it's the most impressive piece of fashion work I've ever seen her in. Regardless the styling that tends to scream anything but polish, Marion managed to maintain a kind of mysterious aura around her through her elusive expressions, which make her more elegant and iconic than ever.. :heart:

As for the rest of the content, I agree that it's quite underwhelming. I was literally ecstatic about Daphne being in the issue and the four shots she appears in have strengthened my opinion as to her talent as a model but visually it hasn't had that much impact on me. Freja's editorial is great too, nevertheless it saddens me that once again she was envisionned in a strong / rebel role. I think she has reached a point in her career where she has countlessly proved that she could play more thoughtful roles and still be as interesting as ever.
 
Kate is a hot mess in half of her editorial. And I love Kate.

And Terry's photos are ridiculous. A waste of Jamie. lol


Marion look beautiful, though.
 
^there's one shot of the Paris dans la Peau editorial on vogue.fr...


her eyes look overly photoshopped!

...and one shot of the Néo Belphégor ed:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Paris dans le peau is one big advertorial for Estee Lauder in print and DVD format, so excessive photoshopping wouldn't surprise me.
 
Isn't Belphegor a demon? I really don't get the theme of Freja's ed yet as it seems to be going for a gothic look according to what's said there but it just looks dark and not mysterious or gothic at all? But it does look really nice from the previews.

Paris dans la Peau definitely looks way too photoshopped from that preview. Hope the rest is better because so far nothing really excites me about this issue and I want the editorials to be exceptionally good if nothing else.
 
^^Perhaps Belphegor refers to the black leopard-like creature in the photo?
 
When I went a-googling for it, I found reference to some old dictionary of infernal terms, which said:

Known as the demon of discoveries and of ingenious inventions, Belphegor is said to appear as a young girl and to give wealth. He was worshipped by the Moabites as Baalphegor on Mount Phegor. Some rabbis claim that he must be worshipped on a toilet, with offerings being the residue of ones' digestion.
Those rabbis know how to give a demon a glamorous reputation.

EDIT: I see it's a horror novel that's been made into a film several times. Rabbis will still - no doubt - disapprove. And I'm left with the impression that if you go to the toilet in the Louvre, you might be participating in demon worship.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,166
Messages
15,288,770
Members
89,059
Latest member
Malwi
Back
Top