Keeping Up With Lindsay #4 (please put all Lohan news here)
- Thread starter sethii
- Start date
- Status
I mean, when has Michael ever been violent and gotten into trouble with the law? OK, bad example maybe...
Last edited by a moderator:
Leaving Marmont on Tuesday night
http://x17online.com/celebrities/li...ilo_brother_sister_chateau_marmont_032211.php
Was she "in talks"? AA meeting?
http://x17online.com/celebrities/li...ilo_brother_sister_chateau_marmont_032211.php
Was she "in talks"? AA meeting?
Last edited by a moderator:
The Daily Mail has lots of Lohan Family News today!! 
First up- Lindsay's landmark fashion design career...
LILO'S UNGARO LINE ENDS UP ON EBAY
Lindsay Lohan's attempt at being a fashion designer and creating her own collection for French design house Ungaro has bombed.
The disastrous pieces were never sold in any of the high-end stores that most designers strive to see their labels in, and instead have made their way on to eBay.
The troubled actress had collaborated with former Ungaro designer Estrella Archs as the artistic director
According to Imaginary Socialite, four of the better dresses from the collection have now surfaced on the eBay's stylebug section.
One of which is a pink mini dress which was featured in the line's Spring 2010 collection.
It is described as a, 'beautiful cocktail dress with long sleeves and cut out detail along the sleeves with zipper cuffs'.
The dress has an symmetrical v-neckline and fitted silhouette with tapered hem with a side zipper closure.
It is on the site reduced by 25% and is on sale for $442.50 or the nearest offer.
Ungaro's designs normally retail for thousands of dollars whereas Lohan's line is being sold off for a fraction of the usual prices.
The clothing label suffered a backlash from the fashion industry after Lindsay strutted the catwalk for the preview at Paris Fashion Week in October 2009.
Elle magazine reported that the French fashion house has since closed down most of its boutiques and department stores like Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus rid itself of clothes from the fashion line.
Ungaro's owner Asim Abdullah confirmed in March last year that Lindsay was no longer collaborating with the company.
Next: Michael's charges and bail reduced!!
Meanwhile, Lindsay's father Michael Lohan has been charged with domestic violence after being arrested on Monday night.
He was allegedly holding his girlfriend against her will and preventing her from calling the police.
The 50-year-old was arrested on three felony charges of domestic violence, preventing the report of the victimisation, false imprisonment and inflicting corporal injury on a cohabitant.
Although his bail was initially set at $30,000 he was later released without having to post that sum and instead posted just $250.
The charge against Michael has now been reduced to a single misdemeanor charge of 'inflicting injury on a Cohabitant'.
His arraignment date has been set for May 23 when he has been ordered to appear at the Beverly Hills Court. He is expected to plead not guilty.
And last: Lindsay goes before a new judge now and she could be jailed right away pending a hearing!! Sounds like she really showed them how smart she is!!
First up- Lindsay's landmark fashion design career...
LILO'S UNGARO LINE ENDS UP ON EBAY
Lindsay Lohan's attempt at being a fashion designer and creating her own collection for French design house Ungaro has bombed.
The disastrous pieces were never sold in any of the high-end stores that most designers strive to see their labels in, and instead have made their way on to eBay.
The troubled actress had collaborated with former Ungaro designer Estrella Archs as the artistic director
According to Imaginary Socialite, four of the better dresses from the collection have now surfaced on the eBay's stylebug section.
One of which is a pink mini dress which was featured in the line's Spring 2010 collection.
It is described as a, 'beautiful cocktail dress with long sleeves and cut out detail along the sleeves with zipper cuffs'.
The dress has an symmetrical v-neckline and fitted silhouette with tapered hem with a side zipper closure.
It is on the site reduced by 25% and is on sale for $442.50 or the nearest offer.
Ungaro's designs normally retail for thousands of dollars whereas Lohan's line is being sold off for a fraction of the usual prices.
The clothing label suffered a backlash from the fashion industry after Lindsay strutted the catwalk for the preview at Paris Fashion Week in October 2009.
Elle magazine reported that the French fashion house has since closed down most of its boutiques and department stores like Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus rid itself of clothes from the fashion line.
Ungaro's owner Asim Abdullah confirmed in March last year that Lindsay was no longer collaborating with the company.
Next: Michael's charges and bail reduced!!
Meanwhile, Lindsay's father Michael Lohan has been charged with domestic violence after being arrested on Monday night.
He was allegedly holding his girlfriend against her will and preventing her from calling the police.
The 50-year-old was arrested on three felony charges of domestic violence, preventing the report of the victimisation, false imprisonment and inflicting corporal injury on a cohabitant.
Although his bail was initially set at $30,000 he was later released without having to post that sum and instead posted just $250.
The charge against Michael has now been reduced to a single misdemeanor charge of 'inflicting injury on a Cohabitant'.
His arraignment date has been set for May 23 when he has been ordered to appear at the Beverly Hills Court. He is expected to plead not guilty.
And last: Lindsay goes before a new judge now and she could be jailed right away pending a hearing!! Sounds like she really showed them how smart she is!!
Last edited by a moderator:
Lindsay Lohan's Lawyer: We're Gonna Win!
March 24th, 2011
Hours after Lindsay Lohan nixed a plea deal that would have ended her felony theft case with a light sentence, her lawyer was talking a good game.
On Wednesday, Shawn Chapman Holley proclaimed her embattled client's innocence and declared that the train wreck will be acquitted by a jury.
"Ms. Lohan has maintained her innocence from the moment this case was filed and she has never wavered from that," Holley said in a statement.
"Although many people advised her to follow the safe route by taking 'the deal,' the truth is, Ms. Lohan is innocent; she has a strong defense."
"We are confident a jury will listen to the evidence fairly and acquit her."
Holley formally notified the DA that Lindsay wasn't going to be accepting a plea deal that would include jail time and opted to go to trial.
At her preliminary hearing April 22, Judge Stephanie Sautner could remand Lohan into custody for violating probation as she awaits trial.
Holley and Lohan must be confident this won't happen, however, because if it does, she'll do more jail time than if she'd taken the plea.
If Lindsay is innocent, then no probation violation would have occurred. So it's possible Sautner will allow her to remain free before trial.
We'll find out in a few short weeks. In the meantime, Lindsay will most likely act shady and continue to calm her nerves by partying.
hollywoodgossip.com
March 24th, 2011
Hours after Lindsay Lohan nixed a plea deal that would have ended her felony theft case with a light sentence, her lawyer was talking a good game.
On Wednesday, Shawn Chapman Holley proclaimed her embattled client's innocence and declared that the train wreck will be acquitted by a jury.
"Ms. Lohan has maintained her innocence from the moment this case was filed and she has never wavered from that," Holley said in a statement.
"Although many people advised her to follow the safe route by taking 'the deal,' the truth is, Ms. Lohan is innocent; she has a strong defense."
"We are confident a jury will listen to the evidence fairly and acquit her."
Holley formally notified the DA that Lindsay wasn't going to be accepting a plea deal that would include jail time and opted to go to trial.
At her preliminary hearing April 22, Judge Stephanie Sautner could remand Lohan into custody for violating probation as she awaits trial.
Holley and Lohan must be confident this won't happen, however, because if it does, she'll do more jail time than if she'd taken the plea.
If Lindsay is innocent, then no probation violation would have occurred. So it's possible Sautner will allow her to remain free before trial.
We'll find out in a few short weeks. In the meantime, Lindsay will most likely act shady and continue to calm her nerves by partying.
hollywoodgossip.com
What is the "strong defense"? That she was filmed on camera leaving the store wearing the necklace without paying or doing loan paperwork? Or that she returned the necklace to the police rather than the store? If I took something by mistake I'd go back right away and apologise. Time for Lindsay to learn that she may be "special" but she isn't special in any other way.
I like her new tweet, way to sound like a spoiled ******.
I like her new tweet, way to sound like a spoiled ******.
7:00am russian bazaar call times are just too much! i think i'm still going to be waking up in hair/make-up..but praise fashion+kellogs!
--http://www.tmz.com/2009/12/29/michael-lohan-lindsay-lohan-erin-muller-abuse-punch-kick-documents/
--http://www.hollywoodgrind.com/michael-lohan-arrested-again/
Sounds unfortunately familiar to current charges ... a model family.
I'm not a lawyer (although I watched LA Law for years..) but this sounds rather optomistic to me...
Legal Experts Believe Lindsay Lohan Stands a Good Chance at Trial
This week brought an important development in Lindsay Lohan's ongoing legal saga: The starlet officially declared she would not take a plea deal, which would have involved some mandatory jail time, on felony grand theft charges for allegedly stealing a necklace from Kamofie & Company jewelry store. Instead, she will take her chances at trial. LiLo had already indicated that she wouldn't take any plea that involved jail time, so PopEater asked some legal experts to weigh in on whether going to trial is a good idea.
Gerald Lefcourt, a prominent New York attorney and past president of the Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, points out that the question of whether to make a deal or go to trial is the critical question in every case. "One of the toughest and most important decisions an accused faces is whether to accept a negotiated plea offer or take the risk of going to trial and have her fate decided by a jury. That decision is even more difficult in high-profile cases where concerns about damaging pre-trial publicity, public sentiment about the accused and the ability to find a fair and impartial jury predominate. Pleading guilty eliminates uncertainty and is often the best way to mitigate the risk of receiving a harsher sentence if convicted after trial."
That same logic prompted most of the media to take the position that Lohan ought to have quit while she was ahead and taken the plea while it was still on the table. But when it comes to this particular case, Lohan might fare better at trial, says celebrity lawyer Ed Hayes, who has represented everyone from Diddy to Robert DeNiro and was the basis for the lawyer character in 'Bonfire of the Vanities.'
Hayes says the first question to ask is: Did she do it? "I wouldn't take a plea if she didn't do it," he says. Hayes believes this case will hinge upon whether the defense is able to produce evidence that supports the claim that Lohan borrowed the necklace for a photo shoot or other event with the store's consent. "Suppose they get a stylist who comes to court and says, 'Lindsay brought me the necklace because we were gonna use it for a shoot, and I forgot to bring it back.' If that's the case, she's gonna get acquitted," he says, adding that if she has a legitimate defense, it shouldn't be difficult to prove.
And in all fairness to Lohan, that isn't such a radically farfetched idea. She may be an easy target, but the reality is that there are many reasons to believe that she may actually be innocent this time around. For starters, she had $3,000 in cash with her at the time of the supposed theft, which we know because on the same visit to Kamofie & Company, she made a cash offer on a ring for that amount.
Also, it has been widely reported that the store owners have been shopping a book deal about the episode. "Trying to sell a book deal based on a relatively minor shoplifting incident is really scuzzy," says Hayes. And it undermines the complainant's credibility, indicating that they're just in it for the publicity and possible payoff.
Hayes points out that after the alleged theft, Lohan made no effort to conceal that she had the item. She was even photographed wearing it afterward, which is what led to her arrest in the first place. "She wasn't hiding it, she was wearing it, and that's a reason to believe her," he says.
But even though there are valid reasons to believe she didn't do it, in a criminal trial the bottom line is whether the jury buys what you're selling. Hayes says that if Lohan misbehaves in court or appears to have an attitude, "she's not going to be very attractive to a jury, which is a big thing."
On the other hand, with the right jurors, she might come across as sympathetic. "I might put her on the stand and have her say, 'Yes, I've had a troubled life, I've had a d**g and alcohol problem, my life has fallen apart. But I didn't have any reason to steal that necklace, and I didn't do it,'" Hayes says.
So what would the ideal jury look like? Hayes would prefer men to women. "Women might not be as sympathetic to a troubled girl. Younger women might like her because of her celebrity status," he says, though they might also resent her for the same reason. "I'd also take the type of men who are naturally protective of young women. ... I wouldn't take, say, a banker or an accountant. I'd definitely take a social worker, a person who works in a store, a stylist. It would be great to have a stylist on the jury."
Well, perhaps if Lindsay is really lucky, she'll have someone like Hayes on the jury.
Popeater.com
Legal Experts Believe Lindsay Lohan Stands a Good Chance at Trial
This week brought an important development in Lindsay Lohan's ongoing legal saga: The starlet officially declared she would not take a plea deal, which would have involved some mandatory jail time, on felony grand theft charges for allegedly stealing a necklace from Kamofie & Company jewelry store. Instead, she will take her chances at trial. LiLo had already indicated that she wouldn't take any plea that involved jail time, so PopEater asked some legal experts to weigh in on whether going to trial is a good idea.
Gerald Lefcourt, a prominent New York attorney and past president of the Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, points out that the question of whether to make a deal or go to trial is the critical question in every case. "One of the toughest and most important decisions an accused faces is whether to accept a negotiated plea offer or take the risk of going to trial and have her fate decided by a jury. That decision is even more difficult in high-profile cases where concerns about damaging pre-trial publicity, public sentiment about the accused and the ability to find a fair and impartial jury predominate. Pleading guilty eliminates uncertainty and is often the best way to mitigate the risk of receiving a harsher sentence if convicted after trial."
That same logic prompted most of the media to take the position that Lohan ought to have quit while she was ahead and taken the plea while it was still on the table. But when it comes to this particular case, Lohan might fare better at trial, says celebrity lawyer Ed Hayes, who has represented everyone from Diddy to Robert DeNiro and was the basis for the lawyer character in 'Bonfire of the Vanities.'
Hayes says the first question to ask is: Did she do it? "I wouldn't take a plea if she didn't do it," he says. Hayes believes this case will hinge upon whether the defense is able to produce evidence that supports the claim that Lohan borrowed the necklace for a photo shoot or other event with the store's consent. "Suppose they get a stylist who comes to court and says, 'Lindsay brought me the necklace because we were gonna use it for a shoot, and I forgot to bring it back.' If that's the case, she's gonna get acquitted," he says, adding that if she has a legitimate defense, it shouldn't be difficult to prove.
And in all fairness to Lohan, that isn't such a radically farfetched idea. She may be an easy target, but the reality is that there are many reasons to believe that she may actually be innocent this time around. For starters, she had $3,000 in cash with her at the time of the supposed theft, which we know because on the same visit to Kamofie & Company, she made a cash offer on a ring for that amount.
Also, it has been widely reported that the store owners have been shopping a book deal about the episode. "Trying to sell a book deal based on a relatively minor shoplifting incident is really scuzzy," says Hayes. And it undermines the complainant's credibility, indicating that they're just in it for the publicity and possible payoff.
Hayes points out that after the alleged theft, Lohan made no effort to conceal that she had the item. She was even photographed wearing it afterward, which is what led to her arrest in the first place. "She wasn't hiding it, she was wearing it, and that's a reason to believe her," he says.
But even though there are valid reasons to believe she didn't do it, in a criminal trial the bottom line is whether the jury buys what you're selling. Hayes says that if Lohan misbehaves in court or appears to have an attitude, "she's not going to be very attractive to a jury, which is a big thing."
On the other hand, with the right jurors, she might come across as sympathetic. "I might put her on the stand and have her say, 'Yes, I've had a troubled life, I've had a d**g and alcohol problem, my life has fallen apart. But I didn't have any reason to steal that necklace, and I didn't do it,'" Hayes says.
So what would the ideal jury look like? Hayes would prefer men to women. "Women might not be as sympathetic to a troubled girl. Younger women might like her because of her celebrity status," he says, though they might also resent her for the same reason. "I'd also take the type of men who are naturally protective of young women. ... I wouldn't take, say, a banker or an accountant. I'd definitely take a social worker, a person who works in a store, a stylist. It would be great to have a stylist on the jury."
Well, perhaps if Lindsay is really lucky, she'll have someone like Hayes on the jury.
Popeater.com
1) There are volumes & volumes full of accounts of wealthy shoplifters ... it's not about the money.
2) So "stylist" directed LiLoser to steal the necklace??? Store said she did not have their permission.
3) No effort to conceal theft, was photographed with necklace -- she was also photographed wearing a fur coat she stole. Opens the door to that.
4) Calling the victim "scuzzy" is scuzzy.
5) Did she do it? -- it's on videotape.
6) But, it's Hollywood ..... different moral code out there ..... she'll get off.
2) So "stylist" directed LiLoser to steal the necklace??? Store said she did not have their permission.
3) No effort to conceal theft, was photographed with necklace -- she was also photographed wearing a fur coat she stole. Opens the door to that.
4) Calling the victim "scuzzy" is scuzzy.
5) Did she do it? -- it's on videotape.
6) But, it's Hollywood ..... different moral code out there ..... she'll get off.
1) What is it supposed to be about? About fame? She is in the spotlight stealing or not stealing.
2) Store can say whatever they want, but it is not necessary true
3) The necklace could be lend, maybe?
3) If the victim is lying, it will be scuzzy
4) In the videotape I can see how the store lend Lindsay a necklace
5) Sorry for my English B)
2) Store can say whatever they want, but it is not necessary true
3) The necklace could be lend, maybe?
3) If the victim is lying, it will be scuzzy
4) In the videotape I can see how the store lend Lindsay a necklace
5) Sorry for my English B)
isa.b.elle.
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2009
- Messages
- 3,516
- Reaction score
- 4
^bad things are going to happen...
^ Like this....? 
Just when Lindsay Lohan thought her legal problems couldn't get any worse ... TMZ has learned cops are reigniting their investigation into allegations she attacked a Betty Ford staffer.
Sources connected to the investigation tell us ... in the last two days, the Riverside County District Attorney's Office sent investigators to meet with key witnesses who were with Lindsay on December 12, 2010 -- the night she allegedly got into a tusslewith Dawn Holland.
We're told cops told the witnesses they were conducting the investigation because the D.A. is still determining whether to pursue criminal assault charges against Lohan.
Sources tell us ... investigators wanted to know if the witness could testify if it was Lindsay or Dawn who was the "aggressor" during that fateful night. They also wanted to know if the witness could describe any sort of injury Dawn may have suffered during the incident.
We're told investigators also wanted to know if the witnesses would cooperate with authorities if the case went to trial ... but sources say the witnesses wouldn't give a definitive answer.
Just when Lindsay Lohan thought her legal problems couldn't get any worse ... TMZ has learned cops are reigniting their investigation into allegations she attacked a Betty Ford staffer.
Sources connected to the investigation tell us ... in the last two days, the Riverside County District Attorney's Office sent investigators to meet with key witnesses who were with Lindsay on December 12, 2010 -- the night she allegedly got into a tusslewith Dawn Holland.
We're told cops told the witnesses they were conducting the investigation because the D.A. is still determining whether to pursue criminal assault charges against Lohan.
Sources tell us ... investigators wanted to know if the witness could testify if it was Lindsay or Dawn who was the "aggressor" during that fateful night. They also wanted to know if the witness could describe any sort of injury Dawn may have suffered during the incident.
We're told investigators also wanted to know if the witnesses would cooperate with authorities if the case went to trial ... but sources say the witnesses wouldn't give a definitive answer.
And- Lindsay may also be upset that the new girl is much cuter than she is at this point...
Lindsay -- FURIOUS After Ex-GF Kisses Another Girl
3/25/2011 by TMZ Staff
Lindsay Lohan is STEAMING MAD after photos surfaced showing her ex-girlfriend Samantha Ronson making out with a mystery woman in L.A. yesterday ... TMZ has learned.
Sources close to Lohan tell us ... even though LiLo and Sam officially aren't dating, Lindsay was under the impression Ronson wasn't seeing anyone else ... and Lindsay feels hurt and betrayed.
In fact, we're told Ronson recently dropped the L-bomb to Lohan ... telling her "I love you" as recently as this morning.
And buckle up ... because we're told Lindsay plans on confronting Ronson about the situation when Sam gets off the plane in NY later today.
Stay tuned...
Lindsay -- FURIOUS After Ex-GF Kisses Another Girl
3/25/2011 by TMZ Staff
Lindsay Lohan is STEAMING MAD after photos surfaced showing her ex-girlfriend Samantha Ronson making out with a mystery woman in L.A. yesterday ... TMZ has learned.
Sources close to Lohan tell us ... even though LiLo and Sam officially aren't dating, Lindsay was under the impression Ronson wasn't seeing anyone else ... and Lindsay feels hurt and betrayed.
In fact, we're told Ronson recently dropped the L-bomb to Lohan ... telling her "I love you" as recently as this morning.
And buckle up ... because we're told Lindsay plans on confronting Ronson about the situation when Sam gets off the plane in NY later today.
Stay tuned...
- Status
Similar Threads
- Locked
- Locked
