Miss Dalloway
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2006
- Messages
- 25,708
- Reaction score
- 993
^
For The 90th anniversary, i expected a diverse content, from photographer's, models to stylists! How can you have Josh Olins, and no Mario Testino? Steven Klein doing his usual schtick, and no Demarchelier? Wtf! Terry Richardson doing a bad Boudin rendition? While there is no Craig McDean, Peter Lindbergh.....! With some tired androgyne & lifeless party spreads? Lara Stone showing her breast's (yeah yeah, they are magnificent, we all agree about that, and it was a point made many a time already by VP), and no Gisele.etc The fashion editorials are astoundingly bad to me, not to mention the god awful trite styling!
Nothing from the "new" content in this issue feels like its fresh, exciting or iconic (a great shot of Roberto Bolle will not get you cool points with me, because that aint a hard thing to achieve, since the man is a god! Nor will dressing up someones kid niece).
What i did like however, and thought its rather well edited, was the Souvenir section, and Noire Idole. But then i didn't care much for the chosen archive images of the 8 Iconic Women they featured.
After closing the magazine, i had to ask myself; is this really the best they can offer from & for ninety years of Vogue Paris? I say no, i refuse to believe that! I hope things change at VP, and they find their "sexy" back, because they have been serving us a very cold dish for a damn while now, imho anyway.
ps: Thank you for being mature enough not to throw an abbreviation, or a silly smilie my way, but acknowledging that we are all entitled to our opinion in this forum. And i'm glad that you, unlike me, love the issue, and find it satisfactory.
For The 90th anniversary, i expected a diverse content, from photographer's, models to stylists! How can you have Josh Olins, and no Mario Testino? Steven Klein doing his usual schtick, and no Demarchelier? Wtf! Terry Richardson doing a bad Boudin rendition? While there is no Craig McDean, Peter Lindbergh.....! With some tired androgyne & lifeless party spreads? Lara Stone showing her breast's (yeah yeah, they are magnificent, we all agree about that, and it was a point made many a time already by VP), and no Gisele.etc The fashion editorials are astoundingly bad to me, not to mention the god awful trite styling!
Nothing from the "new" content in this issue feels like its fresh, exciting or iconic (a great shot of Roberto Bolle will not get you cool points with me, because that aint a hard thing to achieve, since the man is a god! Nor will dressing up someones kid niece).
What i did like however, and thought its rather well edited, was the Souvenir section, and Noire Idole. But then i didn't care much for the chosen archive images of the 8 Iconic Women they featured.
After closing the magazine, i had to ask myself; is this really the best they can offer from & for ninety years of Vogue Paris? I say no, i refuse to believe that! I hope things change at VP, and they find their "sexy" back, because they have been serving us a very cold dish for a damn while now, imho anyway.
ps: Thank you for being mature enough not to throw an abbreviation, or a silly smilie my way, but acknowledging that we are all entitled to our opinion in this forum. And i'm glad that you, unlike me, love the issue, and find it satisfactory.