I actually have a problem because several of them look / are so young.
This was in reply to my message immediately before. It was deleted because I talked about something that is "banned" according to the rules, by accident. I guess I can't say what it was without breaking the rules again so I won't say. It's not relevant anyway.
But aside from that, I made a joke that the pirelli calendar models needed to become younger or else better looking, "one or the other", to be edgier. So that's what she's responding to.
Thanks for replying. But, may I ask you to specify what your "problem" is? Some people would find it inappropriate to put "young" people in a sexualized calendar like the pirelli. But then again fashion has so many "young" women modeling anyway.
On the other hand some people would just be bored by girls that look young as in "without character" and boring.
Or some others yet would find it to be like the cradle robbing the grave, with young models taking money and jobs away from older models.
I keep saying "young" but that too needs to be specified. Some people would say 14 is "young" others 18 others 25 others 35 etc. These girls *I think but I'm not sure* are all over 18 (not that that has any legal relevance so long as it's "art") and a few "look" like they're about 16. But then again in the real world some young people / teens actually look very old and worn for their age and some quite older adults look extremely young, to the point that they might still be asked for i.d. to prove they're legal adults at all. So looks are deceptive.
So, if you like, could you specify both what age of "young" you refer to and what the nature of the problem with the calendar would be? It's an interesting fashion industry point that isn't discussed much.
And don't discuss politics or they'll erase your words. That too is against the rules, I just re-learned. It'd be interesting to see if such a discussion is possible while maintaining a civil / apolitical tone.